Great idea, But to take it one step further, think I'll use 10, 20, 30, ... That way I'll have room to insert new levels where ever I need them.
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/26/07, drew einhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's how I set up my repository priorities, with some questions, > and request for comments on whether there are better ways of doing > things. I'm running on CentOS 5, some of the repositories do not > exist, some exist but are empty, etc. If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base etc. Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- Drew Einhorn
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
