I always look here http://cr.yp.to/hardware/build-20060107.html
He hasn't updated it recently. But the reasons Dan Bernstein made the choices he did are mostly still vaiid and it's interesting reading. On 8/9/07, Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting > using > real server and client softwares. > > So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an > 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast > just for resizing a window on the screen during the session. > > Talk about totally lame... > > I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting opinions yet I need > some > experienced perspective please? > > Can anyone chime in on what they use or what they would buy if they were > going to have a workstation box for development that could double as test > server and have good high speed storage and excellent video and audio etc > etc > > Im thinking of a box that does audio and video development, can easily > handle virtualization, and of course do general work apps plus setting up > various server processes for testing whether intranet or internet etc etc > > It can be premade like specific dell or hp (please list component choices > for clarity) > > OR > > A hand built box with specific list of components that > > Now, I know this has been done in magazines with great expense, and even > with lower expense, yet I trust the list more than a magazine that wants > to > sell me advertising etc > > Thanks in advance > > - rh > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Drew Einhorn
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
