On 10/26/2016 05:56 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:21:54 -0700
> Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Leon Fauster
>> <leonfaus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Am 25.10.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Peter Kjellström <c...@nsc.liu.se>:  
>>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200
>>>> Christian Anthon <ant...@rth.dk> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is
>>>>> officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to
>>>>> attacks using ptrace.  
>>>>
>>>> I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel
>>>> (local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix.
>>>>
>>>> Ask off-list if you want an src.rpm  
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Peter, can you confirm that its this?
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.centos.org/56391/  
>>
>> That is for the EL-7.2 kernel. Peter was offering a patch for CentOS
>> 6.
>>
>> RH released the patched kernel for EL-6.8 today. I have attached the
>> diff file between 2.6.32-642.6.1.el6 and 2.6.32-642.6.2.el6. It is
>> more complex because the 6 kernel is older, so required more mods, I
>> suppose. Maybe that was the reason why the EL-6 update took longer
>> than EL-7.
> 
> We also did a quick diff for the official c6 patch and it's almost but
> not quite what we were using as a quick fix.
> 
> /Peter

The 6 kernel is released now  ..  Use that :)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to