On Friday, January 29, 2021 3:19:21 AM PST Thomas Bendler wrote: > > The IP wanted "support IA64 based OS's and it *needs* to be an exact (VM) > > copy of production" which most likely means "x86_64" code (not really IA64 > > which is Itanium, isn't it?).
Exactly right - I think I need to have access to a VM that's binary-compatible with production so that I can make sure it "really really works" before pushing stuff out.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
