przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: > The above numbers are true if we have random (!) IO pattern. > In case of sequential (!) IO even SATA disks can deliver much, much higher > numbers. >
sequential IO is remarkably rare in a typical server environment anyways, the IOPS numbers on sequential operations aren't much higher, they are just transferring more data per operation. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
