On 23/02/11 16:24, Lucian wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua <jtrut...@csbsju.edu> wrote: > +1 for Virtualmin. > People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the > job for me and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had > security problems because of it.
That one user with more than 100 installations haven't experienced security issues with a product doesn't mean that there is no security issues. It can just as much mean nobody tried to hack any of those installations, or that they have tried but not succeeded yet, or that there are no security issues ... but to distinguish this, then you need to have more solid arguments than "I haven't experienced it" ... because you might not have experienced it _yet_. kind regards, David Sommerseth _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
