on 4/4/2011 3:11 PM David Brian Chait spake the following: > "SL didn't pass the muster in our env in terms of a drop in replacement > for Centos. > > On the other hand, we have simply dropped in Centos in place of RHEL w/ > o issue. > > Our env is a rather complex CGI/VFX based pipeline that is not trivial > to design or support. > > So if you have 12-24 months, I'd wait, seriously man, what's the rush?" > > > I have to provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure, and that requires a > reliable provider / updates. While I do not need Centos 6 today, this > development cycle has certainly raised questions as to whether the > development process can be relied upon. The whole "when it's ready" mantra > works well for academic/individual users, but you can't plan business > processes based on it. If you need the "real thing" for business cases, then you shouldn't be looking at copies and knockoffs. You should buy direct from the manufacturer, RedHat...
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
