Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: > On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting >> 6.0 RH releases patched source. This makes backing out a patch, or >> backporting patches from future development in Fedora (e.g.) far more >> nightmarish than before. > > This one doesn't impact the CentOS core rebuild. It would/could impact > CentOSPlus.
Yes, it _could_ affect the centosplus kernel. This point was addressed early on when RHEL-6 was released back in Nov 2010. See: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outlined there. While you are there, look also at the issues described for Point 3 (note 12052). Anyone can help in there as well. :) So far, "luckily" centosplus kernels are "ahead of" the distro kernel in that they have been built and are available for testing (see note 12502). Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
