On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:06PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/
I've read the articles; I've no need to re-read them.
> (For the record, I couldn't find any previous disparaging comments from
> him... I
> stopped at page 6)
You didn't look very hard.
> Maybe he is a hack, I have no clue. But he is a hack with a fairly big
> linux-focused audience that repeated a few home truths (in my opinion). I am
> using it to try to illustrate how the status quo is harming the project. If
> that
> isn't important to you or you don't agree, that's fine.
The project is fine for what I need it for. And, again, it's only a
tiny fraction of the user base that has a problem with the project and
the project management that are making a big stink about things.
> And those that think everything is peachy are also a tiny minority as far as
> we
> know, because I reckon 95%+ of CentOS users never post on the list. I wish
> people would stop stating what the *think* as *fact*.
I've never said that there weren't issues. Matter of fact I've agreed
that there are indeed communication problems that I hope will be
resolved. The difference is I'm not crying about the sky falling.
And do us a favor? Take your own advice.
John
--
Given sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
-- Woody Page, Denver sports columnist
pgp049x9N1O9m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
