In article <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> wrote: > John Hodrien wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:16 -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> > >>> Gmagic/Imagick are somewhat incapable of doing graphing at all. > >> > >> Have you ever really looked ? What about GmagickDraw::point and similar > >> items ? > > > > I think the risk of the KISS approach is that you tend to reimplement > > everything, because everything everyone else has done is overcomplicated. > > The "danger" of KISS approach? So, you endorse complex and complicated > schemes? And here I thought that the True Believers in OO asserted that > OOP was cleaner, simpler, and easier.
As Einstein said once: "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." More to the point would be: "Judging something *solely* on its simplicity is an overly simplistic approach." -- Kiel Hodges. This appears to me to be the trap that Paul Always Learning has fallen into. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [email protected] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [email protected] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
