On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Karanbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 08:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Any luck on the specific attack path yet? The linked article
>> suggests Centos up to 5.5 was vulnerable.
>
> We dont have access to the actual machines that were broken into - so
> pretty much everything is second hand info.
>
> But based on what we know and what we have been told and what we have
> worked out ourselves as well, its almost certainly bruteforced ssh
> passwords.
So, coincidence that they were CentOS, and pre-5.6? Did they have
admins in common?
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
