The great strength of capitalism is also its failure... the inventiveness
and ambition of bright people.  John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie were
not bad people, they were very smart.  But regulation was needed to control
their monopolies (the Sherman and Clayton Acts in the late 18th and early
19th centuries).  The right to compete, a fundamental component of
capitalism, was being eroded because of unregulated monopolistic
corporations linked by trusts.  The monopolistic capitalists got too clever
and too big.

 

Likewise, the risk-taking and freewheeling traders and stock speculators in
the '20s learned to make fortunes (albeit ephemeral), by making outrageously
leveraged trades on the margin.  Eventually, we forgot the lessons we
learned in the 20s and loosened the controls that were essential to prevent
a system-wide meltdown.  We forgot the lessons of excess leverage and
weakened safeguards.  The safeguards we kept were poorly implemented.

 

In the 1980s and 1990s the fed shifted from Keynesian fiscal control of the
money supply to Chicago-School monetary control of the money supply.  I
admit that I thought that Greenspan was doing a remarkable job keeping our
economy on an even keel with his manipulation of interest rates.  I didn't
recognize the extent of the danger from the easy credit and the excessively
leveraged derivative trading.

 

We screwed up on a couple of major fronts... loosening or abandoning
essential regulations, and badly using the regulatory power we had.  Like it
or not, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism is doomed to damage itself
without regulation.  There are simply too many bright and ambitious people
out there who will find out ways to exploit legal schemes to make gobs of
money.  With good regulation, these people will continue to make gobs of
money in clever ways, but they will do it in a way that won't cause periodic
system wide meltdowns.

 

Chris

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dr. Ernie
Prabhakar
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 10:30 AM
To: Radical Centrist Discussions
Subject: [RC] A Failure of Capitalism (II)--Whom to Blame? - Richard
A.Posner

 

A useful analysis.  While this could be read as blaming the government for
everything, the implication is that the industry *needs* the government to
regulate it appropriately, as otherwise the market incentive always ends up
leading to taking on excessive risk...

 

-- Ernie P.

 

http://correspondents.theatlantic.com/richard_posner/2009/05/a_failure_of_ca
pitalism_ii--whom_to_blame--richard_a_posner.php

 

In fact the bankers took too many risks from an overall economic standpoint,
and that is the immediate cause of the economic hole we're in. They made too
many risky loans, especially in real estate, and when the risks materialized
the banks' assets, which included many real estate mortgages and securities
backed by such mortgages, plunged in value. The banks found themselves
undercapitalized and reduced their lending, which slowed economic activity,
which began the downward spiral that we're in.

They were permitted and indeed encouraged to take risks that were too great
from the standpoint of economic stability by the government itself, in two
major respects. First, the regulatory controls that had once limited the
amount of risk that banks could take, in recognition of the potentially
catastrophic effects on economic stability of a collapse or near collapse of
the banking industry, were gradually dismantled, beginning in the 1970s. Not
completely dismantled, but enough dismantled to allow competition almost
free rein to push the bankers toward taking more risks than were good for
the nation's economic welfare.

And second, the Federal Reserve pushed interest rates too far down at the
end of 2000 and kept them there longer than made economic sense. The results
included a housing bubble, a credit bubble, the bursting of the bubbles, and
the ensuing swoon of the banking industry--all of which I'll explain in the
next blog in this series. 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to