Actually there are several varieties of Socialism, and some simply don't
fit
the model Rand wants us to accept as standard issue. Admittedly some  of
these alternatives are now mostly historic and either don't exist
or are vestiges of their former selves, but we don't go around
trashing Robber Baron Capitalism or Rockefeller monopolies
since they also don't exist any more or are vestigial.

I get the point, but it applies paint with a bucket instead of a  brush.

Billy

-------------------------------------------------------------


In a message dated 6/1/2009 10:43:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:

B.

David



“There  is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the
means of  achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by
force,  socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and
 suicide.”--Ayn Rand




Dr. Ernie  Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Chris,


On Jun 1, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Chris Hahn wrote:



Now, with a lessening of "legacy"  union and retirement entitlements, GM
has a better chance at being  successful.  I am no automotive business expert
so I will answer the  challenge in two ways.


Okay, but that dodges the political question: do you think the Federal
Government will be [perceived as] meddling in GM's operations, and if so  will
that make (A) or (B) more likely? :-)


-- Ernie P.






A.  Management at "new company"  makes cars that customers want to buy at a
price that is  competitive.  Then, in 5 years the American People's stock
will be  worth something and half of it will have been sold for a profit,
enriching _ the Treasury.  In 10 years all of the American People's stock will
have been sold for a considerable profit to the American  People.
B.  Management can't create  competitive cars.  Then, in 5 years we, the
American People, will  have lost our investment and GM will be liquidated in
Chapter 7.  At  a certain point I think the Obama administration will let GM
fail.   10 years is a moot point.
Chris


____________________________________

From: [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])   
[_mailto:[email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected]) ]  On Behalf Of Dr. Ernie  
Prabhakar
Sent: Monday,  June 01, 2009 1:22 PM
To:  Radical Centrist Discussions
Subject: [RC] Predictions? “The End  of an Old GM, and the Beginning of a
New  GM”
Okay, time to  put your money where your mouth is. What is your prediction
for what the  relationship between GM and the Federal Government will be
like in 5  years? 10 years?
-- Ernie  P.
_http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-End-of-an-Old-GM-and-the-Beginning-of-a-
New-GM/_
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-End-of-an-Old-GM-and-the-Beginning-of-a-New-GM/)

That's  why our government will be making a significant additional
investment of  about $30 billion in GM -- an investment that will entitle 
American
taxpayers to ownership of about 60 percent of the new  GM.

Now,  let me talk about this.  I recognize that this may give some
Americans pause.  So let me explain as clearly as possible why we are  making 
this
investment.  We inherited a financial crisis unlike any  that we've seen in
our time.  This crisis crippled private capital  markets and forced us to
take steps in our financial system -- and with  our auto companies -- that we
would not have otherwise even  considered.  These steps have put our
government in the unwelcome  position of owning large stakes in private 
companies
for the simple and  compelling reason that their survival and the success of
our overall  economy depend on it.

Understand  we're making these investments not because I want to spend the
American  people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect them.  Instead
of  taking so much stock in GM, we could have simply offered the company
more  loans.  But for years, GM has been buried under an unsustainable
mountain of debt.  And piling an irresponsibly large debt on top of  the new GM
would mean simply repeating the mistakes of the past.  So  we are acting as
reluctant shareholders -- because that is the only way to  help GM succeed.

What  we are not doing -- what I have no interest in doing -- is running
GM.  GM will be run by a private board of directors and management  team with
a track record in American manufacturing that reflects a  commitment to
innovation and quality.  They -- and not the government  -- will call the shots
and make the decisions about how to turn this  company around.  The federal
government will refrain from exercising  its rights as a shareholder in all
but the most fundamental corporate  decisions.  When a difficult decision
has to be made on matters like  where to open a new plant or what type of new
car to make, the new GM, not  the United  States government, will make that
 decision.

In  short, our goal is to get GM back on its feet, take a hands-off
approach,  and get out quickly.




_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list: [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])
_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com)
Archives  at _htt
p://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/)




____________________________________


_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_
(mailto:[email protected])

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com)

Archives at
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/)



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/



_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to