(http://www.washingtonpost.com/)  

 
 
 
 
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;211852992;17836555;s?http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-adv/media_kit/wpni/contact_us.html)
 
 (http://ad.doubleclick.n
et/click;h=v8/384e/3/0/*/a;215410670;1-0;0;37603003;4307-300/250;31847579/31865455/1;;~okv=;A=1;D=5;C=2;E=JHEAB;S=42;S=245;B=24
;B=59;B=99;B=110;~aopt=0/ff/ff00ff/ff;~fdr=215479659;0-0;0;16766288;4307-300
/250;31759001/31776877/1;;~okv=;A=1;D=5;C=2;E=JHEAB;S=42;S=245;B=24;B=59;B=9
9;B=110;~aopt=6/1/ff/1;~sscs=?http://kronos.glow.com/dmg/893121?pid=37603003
&aid=215410670&cid=31847579&publisher=WPN&placement=WPN_ALL_WashingtonPost_R
OS_Q209_300x250) 


Where Anti-Semitism Is  Mainstream
By Richard Cohen
Tuesday, June 16, 2009 
To far more people than we would like to admit, the mystery of _James W. 
von Brunn_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/10/AR2009061001768.html)
 , the alleged shooter  at the Holocaust Memorial Museum, 
is not that he held such weird and depraved  views about Jews and the 
Holocaust, but that those views are considered weird  and depraved. In vast 
parts 
of the Islamic world, too many people not only deny  the Holocaust but 
embrace the thinking that made it possible.  
In his remarkable _speech_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/04/AR2009060401024.html)
  at Cairo University, President  
Obama only inferentially mentioned this aspect of what has become an ugly part  
of the Middle East: a tolerance for and advocacy of old-style anti-Semitism. 
 There is, in fact, nothing that von Brunn professed that is not commonly 
heard  or published in the Middle East. Do Jews control world finance, media, 
 international organizations and the United States itself? Of course. Are 
they  capable of the most foul deeds, including the infamous "blood libel," 
which  means using the blood of non-Jewish children in the preparation of 
traditional  foods? Again, of course.  
This is troubling stuff. But one only has to read the reports of the Middle 
 East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) to see that such views are often 
expressed  and popularly held. Does that mean they are universally accepted? I 
doubt it.  But they can be aired largely without fear of condemnation or, 
more to the  point, of ridicule. It was only two years ago that I stood 
sipping a cup of  coffee in Jordan and read a syndicated column in an 
English-language newspaper  about how Jews were warned of the Sept. 11, 2001, 
attacks -- 
and none of them  died. Apparently, the newspaper felt this was a view 
worth publishing -- an  insane lie if there ever was one.  
We have almost 2,000 years of experience with anti-Semitism and know by now 
 its immense power. It lays the groundwork for the horror that inevitably  
follows. Obama acknowledged the most famous of these when the next day he 
went  from Cairo to the Nazi concentration camp at _Buchenwald_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/05/AR2009060500411.html)
 . 
It was a particularly  appropriate stop, for Buchenwald is right down the 
road from Weimar, the city  once renowned for its intellectual life (Goethe) 
and for the interwar republic  to which it lent its name. The proximity of 
Buchenwald to Weimar tells you all  you need to know about human nature.  
But I would have preferred for the president to have gone to Kielce, the  
Polish city where 42 Jews were _murdered_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kielce_pogrom)  after an allegation of a blood 
libel. This did  not happen in the 
Middle Ages but in 1946 -- 14 months after Germany  surrendered. The 
victims were all Holocaust survivors. They were brutally  murdered not by 
stereotypical Nazis but by ordinary Poles. The Holocaust, with  its "never 
again" 
vow, seems over -- a closed chapter. Kielce makes a different  point. 
Anti-Semitism moves on.  
That anti-Semitism is now a part of Middle Eastern culture. It has  
infiltrated textbooks; it is recited in mosques. It is aired on television --  
for 
instance, the broadcast of a play produced at Gaza's Islamic University in  
which Jews were portrayed as drinking Muslim blood. "You must drink from the 
 blood of Muslims," a father tells his son, according to a _transcript_ 
(http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD230809)  provided by MEMRI. 
"Okay," the son says,  "but just one cup, because I'm full."  
Such views are routinely espoused by religious figures. MEMRI quotes an  
official of the Egyptian Ministry of Religious Endowment as _saying_ 
(http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD235909)  that all Jews are descended 
from 
pigs and can  therefore be slaughtered. This particular statement was 
rebutted by other  religious officials -- such sentiments do not always go 
unchallenged -- but it  remains remarkable and scary that they are aired in the 
first place.  
Obama was right to demand that Israel cease expanding or thickening its 
West  Bank settlements. He is right, too, in acknowledging Palestinian 
aspirations and  the wound that was opened in the Arab world by the creation of 
Israel -- the  nakba, or catastrophe. But the toleration of the vilest kind of  
anti-Semitism is not a precondition for peace, only a warning to Israelis 
that  the past can be prologue. If Arab leaders do not attempt to rebut and 
eliminate  the hatred of Jews that is poisoning their societies, they will 
find that the  peace that most of them undoubtedly want will not be possible.  
James W. von Brunn was quickly segregated from the American mainstream and  
designated the crackpot he is. In the Middle East, though, he would be no 
such  thing -- not some sort of reptilian vestige of the past but an ordinary 
man and  therefore an extraordinary threat to the future.  
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to