"Running a market without government oversight is like running a football game without referees."
Good line Billy. During my "libertarian" years I kept trying to figure out ways to minimalize government, and in many areas I still do; however, there is little doubt in my mind that the financial markets must be regulated by the government (as much as I hate to say it). Similarly, the Andrew Carnegie/John D. Rockefeller monopolists needed regulation. The problem is that politicians are the ones making the regulations. The end result is an imperfect system. financial and economic markets need regulation, but regulators are frequently inept. In retrospect, the great bubble of faux-economic prosperity was bound to pop. My guess is that we will learn some things from this (as they did in the '30s), the government will overreact, over time the overreaction will be corrected, but the correction will go too far. In another 50 years, or so, we will repeat the same cycle. Chris _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [RC] Animal Spirits -economic theory of possible RC interest Centroids : At last, a book that examines psychology as a crucial factor in the working of markets. I just found out about the book after seeing an interviews with one of the authors on the Charlie Rose show last night. In any case, while we can learn the sober truth from other sources, this seems to be an especially valuable re-statement of the principle that markets are less than rational. And this being a truism, laissez faire ideology can now be seen for what it is, horse poop. Running a market without government oversight is like running a football game without referees. The outcome is guaranteed to be unfair, and guaranteed to rob people of an optimal result based on the merits. Needless to say, this does not say that government will always do what it should, and referees may be sub-optimal themselves, but the point is that we do not now have better alternatives. And with government oversight , as with referees, you get consumer confidence, a necessity for a functional economy. Supply side economics disgusted me when it first burst on the scene in the Reagan era. And it is one reason why, although there are various things to admire about Friedman, by and large my view of his economics is dismal, And it is one reason why, unlike Conservatives, I think poorly of Reagan. We were all fed a line of economic crap and have had to pay for this nonsense ever since, in many ways, large and small. The book has been around for several months but seems to just now be making waves. Billy ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- <http://www.nytimes.com/> <http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/> _____ April 19, 2009 Irrational Exuberance By <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/u/louis_uchitell e/index.html?inline=nyt-per> LOUIS UCHITELLE <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/books/review/Uchitelle-t.html?_r=1&pagewa nted=print#secondParagraph> ANIMAL SPIRITS How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism By George A. Akerlof and Robert J. Shiller 230 pp. Princeton University Press. $24.95 Look around you, George A. Akerlof and <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/robert_j_shill er/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Robert J. Shiller say. The second coming of <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/g/great_depres sion_1930s/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> the Great Depression is, like the original, a direct result of animal spirits. If only we had factored those turbulent emotions into economic theory, we might not be repeating the earlier tragedy. Akerlof, a Nobel laureate, and Shiller, a good bet to become one, are prominent mainstream economists. They don't deviate easily from orthodox theory, with its allegiance to the proposition that people are essentially rational, well informed and unemotional in the numerous transactions that shape the economy. But in "Animal Spirits," they have deviated - and they have done so just as mainstream theory self-destructs. There was nothing rational, well -informed or unemotional about the behavior that has all but collapsed the economy. That leaves most of America's economists without a believable framework for explaining how we got into this mess. Akerlof and Shiller are the first to try to rework economic theory for our times. The effort itself makes their book a milestone. Keynes performed a similar service in the 1930s - mainly by making the point that market economies could suffer long periods of high unemployment and low output unless government stepped in to supply the necessary demand. <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/i ndex.html?inline=nyt-per> Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus program reflects his insight. But another aspect of Keynes's thinking did not fare well. He also introduced the world to "animal spirits," coining that phrase to describe a range of emotions, human impulses, enthusiasms and misperceptions that drive economies - and ultimately unwind them. The economists who interpreted Keynes "rooted out almost all of the animal spirits - the noneconomic motives and irrational behaviors - that lay at the heart of his explanation for the Great Depression," -Akerlof and Shiller declare. Addressing this wrong, the authors attempt to restore animal spirits to economic theory. They do this by drawing on the greater understanding of human psychology that exists today, and which Akerlof and Shiller, along with other economists, have incorporated into the relatively new field of behavioral economics. Until now, behavioral economics has focused mainly on a variety of disparate traits that chip away at the assumption of rationality embedded in mainstream -theory. A young person, for example, fails to join a <http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/retirement/401ks-and-similar-plans/ind ex.html?inline=nyt-classifier> 401(k) plan, even one subsidized by his employer, although if he were ra-tional and fully informed, he would certainly sign up. What Akerlof and Shiller do is to highlight this sort of finding, packaging it with numerous other psychological insights into a half-dozen broad maxims that permanently alter the concept of rational behavior. And their book takes their case not just to economists, but also to the general reader. It is short (176 pages of text) and easy enough for laymen to understand (most of the time). Above all, they challenge the reigning free-market ideology of the past 30 years or so, from the rise of <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/margaret_h_tha tcher/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Margaret Thatcher and <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/ronald_wilson_ reagan/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Ronald Reagan to the abrupt arrival of the present crisis late last year. That ideology held that markets should operate free of government because they were rational. But if animal spirits influence behavior, then government must play a broad, disciplinary role, and do so permanently. Akerlof and Shiller spent five years writing "Animal Spirits" and honing that conviction. They are concerned that once we enter a revival, pressure will inevitably build - just as it did in the late 1970s, more than a generation after the Great Depression - to give the markets free rein again. Akerlof and Shiller intend their book as an obstacle to that ever happening. "The system of safeguards developed from the experience of the Great Depression has been eroded," they write. "It is therefore necessary for us to renew our understanding of how capitalist economies - in which people have not only rational economic motives but also all kinds of animal spirits - really work." Both men are old hands at prodding their fellow economists into recognizing exceptions to mainstream theory. Akerlof, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, shared a <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/nobel_prizes/index.html?i nline=nyt-classifier> Nobel Prize in 2001 for his work on "asymmetric information," which means that some parties to a transaction know more about the deal than others, like the used-car salesman who knows more about the shortcomings of the vehicle he is trying to sell than the customer he is pitching. Lemon laws, protecting consumers, grew out of such findings. Akerlof has long believed that in most market situations a government role can improve the outcome. "Animal Spirits" brings that view to a high boil. Shiller, a Yale professor, originated the phrase "irrational exuberance" before <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/alan_greenspan /index.html?inline=nyt-per> Alan Greenspan made it famous, and in his research he has documented the rise and fall of home prices going back decades, to demonstrate that the latest surge was far and away the greatest in American history. The bubble will burst with very unpleasant results, Shiller warned, well before that actually happened. What are these animal spirits that drive the American economy? Confidence is one. Far from dispassionately weighing and analyzing all the options, people act on the confidence, or overconfidence, that a home they are about to buy will be worth more a year later. Confidence drove up stock -prices in the 1920s and again in this decade, far more than corporate balance sheets and pure reason would justify, and now lack of confidence, spreading like a contagious disease, is exacerbating the sell-off. Fairness also shows up as an animal spirit, influencing thousands of decisions in ways that part company with standard theory. Out of a sense of fairness, for example, bosses often pay their employees more than the market demands. "Considerations of fairness are a major motivator in many economic decisions," Akerlof and Shiller write, "and are related to our sense of confidence and our ability to work effectively together." Corruption, too, is an animal spirit. This includes the propensity to produce not just what people really need but what they think they need, like the mortgage-backed securities, "a modern form of snake oil," the authors declare. In their list of animal spirits, the two economists pay special attention to the tendency of people to think in terms of narratives or stories. "High confidence tends to be associated with inspirational stories, stories about new business initiatives, tales of how others are getting rich," the authors write. On the other hand, -stories about the Great Depression shape our narrative of what is happening now, and our behavior. So what is to be done? Animal spirits are human emotions; they can't be turned off. Unchecked, they drive the economy into misbegotten booms and disastrous busts. Tempered by government, on the other hand, they are a great source of entrepreneurial energy, safely channeled into a healthy capitalism. Keynes came to that conclusion, and Akerlof and Shiller, in "Animal Spirits," push hard in the same direction - prodding their colleagues to follow their lead in revamping economic theory to deal with a market system that, quite irrationally, failed to govern itself. Louis Uchitelle is an economics writer for The Times ============================================= Animal spirits (Keynes) >From Wikipedia "Animal spirits" is the term <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes> John Maynard Keynes used in his 1936 book <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_General_Theory_of_Employment,_Interest_and _Money> The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money to describe emotion or affect which influences human behavior and can be measured in terms of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_confidence> consumer confidence. Trust is also included or produced by "animal spirits". Several articles and at least two books with a focus on "animal spirits" have been published in 2008 and 2009 as a part of a so-called <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008-2009_Keynesian_resurgence> Keynesian resurgence. The original passage by Keynes reads: "Even apart from the instability due to speculation, there is the instability due to the characteristic of human nature that a large proportion of our positive activities depend on spontaneous optimism rather than mathematical expectations, whether moral or hedonistic or economic. Most, probably, of our decisions to do something positive, the full consequences of which will be drawn out over many days to come, can only be taken as the result of animal spirits - a spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction, and not as the outcome of a weighted average of quantitative benefits multiplied by quantitative probabilities." <http://up.nytimes.com/?d=0/20/8&t=&s=0&ui=0&r=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2enytimes%2e com%2f2009%2f04%2f19%2fbooks%2freview%2fUchitelle%2dt%2ehtml&u=www%2enytimes %2ecom%2f2009%2f04%2f19%2fbooks%2freview%2fUchitelle%2dt%2ehtml%3f%5fr%3d1%2 6pagewanted%3dprint>
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
