The Power of Belief  ?
 
 
Worthwhile article about the contest for governor in Virginia since
the Republican candidate is a Regent University  graduate.  You  would think
that if anyone would have strong ( unshakable ) belief-based values
it would be a Regent alumnus.
 
Granted, beliefs are important, even decisive in any kind of  life
worth living. But beliefs are hardly lived in a vacuum. Essentially
for most people, we believe what our friends believe.  
 
This is independent of theology to large extent. At issue is not  whether
someone  thinks that Jesus walked on water, whether infants should be  
baptized,
etc, or even whether Christianity is central to life rather than some other 
 faith.
The point concerns social values and the observable fact that in this  area
most people are herd animals  / conformists.
 
If you hang around with Democrats you inevitably become more Democratic in  
outlook,
if you hang out with Republicans the same is true, as it is with anyone  
else. 
There may always be exceptions to this rule, but only as exceptions,
for the most part  ( possibly a 90% level is close ) the  generalization 
holds.
 
That is, belief, when it is not grounded on scientific certainty is a frail 
 reed, indeed.
Robert McDonnell shows this in spades. Apparently none of his beliefs  was
ever substantiated by science, by doing the hard research needed to  
establish
the validity of his values.  Why not ? Presumably because of the view  that
once you believe ( in this case, in the message of the  Bible )  that is 
sufficient
and no further appeal is called for. 
 
You don't need to research anything  Faith is all you need. Except  that,
obviously McDonell's  faith collapsed piecemeal during 20 years  in the 
world
And,  also obviously, this calls into question some basic premises  of
schools like Regent.
 
"Belief is all you need,"  may be OK for an environment like Regent U, 
in which 99% of everyone is an Evangelical or Pentecostal, but as soon as  
you 
are "out in the world," things are different . Half of everyone else, in  
some cities 70 % 
of everyone else, is non-Evangelical. Factoring in Catholics and the  
Eastern Orthodox, 
maybe half of the non-Evangelicals can be looked upon as similar in values, 
 but this hardly
accounts for the pervasive appeal of secular culture and its values ,  which
may have little to do with Christian heritage.
 
What is the best safeguard ?  Science, or as the case may be, social  
science.
That is, if you know that single parent families produce a  disproportionate
number of dysfunctional children then you have "ammunition" quite
apart from any belief in the value of families per se, when making
a case in the public realm. Same for research that demonstrates
the psychopathology  of homosexuals, or still other issues.
 
Alas, many believers, and this applies to many Hindus, Jews,  Buddhists,
and others, not only to Christians,  simply don't respect science  /  
social science
sufficiently to actually DO any such thing, actually take the time to  
research
issues involving values. And they do not because, it seems to me, of
beliefs that stress the importance of belief itself as superior to  science,
sufficient unto itself. 
 
And so the field is ultimately conceded to those who do rely upon  science
or the behavioral  sciences like psychology or sociology. Belief  caves in 
before science,
in other words, even if the science in question is mediated through  
relationships,
that is, attitudes passed along from your  --anyone's-- friends.
 
Just maybe we all need some honesty about the weakness of  belief
rather than assume it necessarily is powerful in all cases,  when, 
clearly, it is not. 
 
Billy
 
 
========================================================
 
 
   
   (http://www.washingtonpost.com/)  

 
 
 
 
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;211852992;17836555;s?http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-adv/media_kit/wpni/contact_us.html)
 



Governor's Race Erupts  Over McDonnell's Past Views
By Amy Gardner, Rosalind S. Helderman and Anita  Kumar
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 
The Virginia governor's race ignited Monday over Republican Robert F.  
McDonnell's 20-year-old graduate thesis: Democrats assailed him in e-mail 
blasts 
 and interviews for what he wrote about working women, homosexuals and  "f
ornicators," and McDonnell tried to explain his views to crucial moderate and 
 female voters.  
After a sleepy summer filled with rural RV tours and policy papers on 
energy  and the economy, news of the thesis, _first reported Sunday_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/29/AR2009082902434.html)
  
in The Washington Post, pushed the race to a  fever pitch.  
McDonnell's opponent, Democrat R. Creigh Deeds, bombarded state and 
national  media with details of the thesis, submitted by McDonnell in 1989 for 
a 
master of  arts in public policy and juris doctorate in law from Regent 
University in  Virginia Beach.  
McDonnell, meanwhile, spoke by telephone to reporters for nearly 90 
minutes,  saying that his views have changed on many of the issues he explored 
as a 
 graduate student. He also released a list of women who support his 
campaign.  
"I'm disappointed but not surprised that my opponent wants to make this a  
central issue in the campaign," said McDonnell, the former state attorney  
general and a 14-year veteran of the House of Delegates. "During my years in 
the  General Assembly, Senator Deeds would suggest that I have this undue 
focus on  social issues. That's just a flat misrepresentation."  
In the thesis, "The Republican Party's Vision for the Family: The 
Compelling  Issue of The Decade," McDonnell described working women as 
"detrimental" 
to the  traditional family. He criticized a U.S. Supreme Court decision 
legalizing  contraception for unmarried couples and decried the "purging" of 
religion from  schools. He advocated character education programs in public 
schools to teach  "traditional Judeo-Christian values," and he criticized 
federal tax credits for  child care expenditures because they encouraged women 
to 
enter the workforce.  
In his call with reporters Monday, a calm and prepared McDonnell explained 
in  detail how he feels about issues that include gay rights, abortion and 
women's  rights. He mentioned several times that on some issues he agrees 
with Gov.  Timothy M. Kaine (D), the state's first Catholic governor, as well 
as with  President Obama.  
McDonnell said he still believes marriage should be limited to one man and  
one woman but thinks that discrimination based on gender, sexual 
orientation or  marital status has no place in government or on the job. He 
said that 
he no  longer agrees with what he wrote about women in the workforce and 
that  regardless of his personal views, he "would follow the law," as he did as 
 attorney general.  
With a recent Washington Post poll giving McDonnell a substantial lead, 
Deeds  and other Democrats sought Monday to shift the momentum.  
McDonnell has focused his campaign on job creation, a message that has  
resonated with pro-business moderates. On Monday, Democrats focused on  
McDonnell's conservatism.  
The Deeds campaign sent out a fundraising appeal with the thesis as its 
main  focus. The state Democratic Party produced a video, "Bob McDonnell's 
Secret  Blueprint for Virginia," setting a news report about the document to 
driving,  apocalyptic classical music. And Kaine, who is chairman of the 
Democratic  National Committee, said that after years of working with McDonnell 
in 
Richmond,  he was "not surprised" by what he read in the thesis.  
"To me, it seems like kind of a blueprint of, 'Here's what I hope to do as 
an  elected official,' and I think he's been working diligently to do that," 
Kaine  said.  
The story quickly spread on liberal blogs, including Daily Kos, Talking  
Points Memo and the Huffington Post. By late afternoon, more than 70 blogs had 
 picked up the thread.  
Democrats have long attempted to characterize McDonnell as an  
ultra-conservative who is playing down his views on such issues as abortion,  
school 
prayer and gay rights so as not to alienate moderate voters, particularly  in 
Northern Virginia, who increasingly decide statewide elections.  
But McDonnell's public record and his reputation among colleagues paint a  
more complex portrait. He appears as a man with deeply conservative views t
hat  spring from a strong Catholic faith but also as reasonable, open-minded 
and  increasingly focused on such issues as jobs and transportation.  
"What I found in him is exactly what I found in Tim Kaine: A man with a  
considerable intellect, who is prepared to think and rethink constantly," said 
 Randal J. Kirk, who was Kaine's biggest individual donor in 2005. Kirk 
said he  is considering a donation to McDonnell.  
By disavowing earlier views on working women and the traditional family and 
 saying little on abortion and gay marriage, McDonnell is choosing to 
appeal to  moderates and suburban women -- but might alienate the conservative 
base.  
"There are three ways to lose," said Patrick M. McSweeney, a former state 
GOP  chairman and a standard-bearer of the party's right wing. "One is you 
can state  a position that is controversial and offend a lot of people. 
Second, you can  not take a position and offend people who want leaders. And 
third, you  can back away from a previously held view. But the worst thing to 
do 
is to lose  votes in all three of those areas."  
The reaction of women and moderates was hard to measure Monday. Democratic  
legislative candidates in Northern Virginia said they were stunned at the 
number  of voters they encountered who had read about the thesis and were 
dismayed by  it. The Deeds campaign reported signing up 300 donors since 
Sunday.  
"If you're going to run on a jobs platform, how do you do that when you  
relegate half of the working population to second-class status? Because that's 
 what this paper he wrote reveals," said Del. Margaret G. Vanderhye 
(D-Fairfax).  
Some Republicans said they had heard little reaction. Others said party  
activists were energized, convinced that McDonnell is being unfairly attacked  
over an old academic paper. Del. _David B. Albo_ 
(http://projects.washingtonpost.com/votersguide/2007/va/candidates/mark-d-sickles/)
  (R-Fairfax) said 
attendees Sunday at a Republican  Women's Club rally in Fairfax said they 
were incensed over what they called a  "hatchet job."  
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to