September 9, 2009  
Democrats Losing Seniors
By _Dick  Morris_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/author/dick_morris/) 

Nowhere is the fallout from Obama's healthcare proposals more evident than  
among the elderly, and nothing is more dangerous permanently for the 
Democratic  Party than their increasing disaffection. 
A Wall Street Journal poll taken last week reflects a gain by Republicans 
in  party identification, closing the gap from 40-33 in April in favor of the 
 Democrats to a Democratic margin of only 35-34. The data reflects that 
one-third  of this six-point closure of the partisan gap comes from a major 
shift among the  elderly - the only demographic group to have moved 
dramatically. 



In April, the elderly broke evenly on their party identification, with 37  
percent supporting each political party. Now the Republicans hold a lead, at 
 46-33. This 13-point closure among the 14 percent of the vote that is cast 
by  those over 65 represents two of the six points of closure nationally. 
No other group changed nearly as much. Neither liberals nor minorities nor  
any other age group moved nearly as dramatically as did the elderly. The  
Journal's pollsters noted that "perhaps the most striking movement is with  
senior citizens." 
The Democratic Party, led by Obama, is systematically converting the 
elderly  vote into a Republican bastion. The work of FDR in passing Social 
Security in  1937 and of LBJ in enacting Medicare in 1965 is being undone by 
the 
president's  healthcare program. The elderly see his proposals for what they 
are: a massive  redistribution of healthcare away from the elderly and toward 
a population that  is younger, healthier and richer but happens, at the 
moment, to lack insurance.  (Remember that the uninsured are, by definition, 
not elderly, not young and not  in poverty - and if they are, they are 
currently eligible for Medicare, Medicaid  or SCHIP and do not need the Obama 
program.) The elderly see the $500 billion  projected cut in Medicare through 
the 
same lens as they viewed Gingrich's  efforts to slice the growth in the 
program in the mid-1990s. 
When the president addresses Congress and the nation on Wednesday night, he 
 will likely indicate a willingness to compromise on aspects of his 
program. He  might attenuate his support of the public option for insurance 
companies and  could soften other aspects of his proposal as it is embodied in 
the 
House  bill. 
But the fundamental equation will not change: He is cutting Medicare 
spending  and using the money to subsidize coverage of those who are now 
uninsured 
but  cannot afford to pay full premiums. It is this equation that has the 
elderly up  in arms. 
And our seniors correctly understand that you cannot extend full health  
benefits to some portion of the 50 million who live here and lack insurance  
without causing rationing of existing health services unless you expand the  
number of doctors and nurses and the amount of medical equipment. 
When President Harry Truman first proposed compulsory health insurance in  
1949, he coupled his proposal with a big increase in federal aid to medical  
education. He grasped the fundamental reality that you cannot expand 
coverage  without expanding the number of people who provide the service - 
unless 
you are  prepared to resort to wholesale rationing. 
If Democratic senators and congressmen believe that the elderly will 
recover  from their Republican tendencies by Election Day 2010 - or even by 
2012 
or 2014  - they misjudge their senior constituents. The elderly are the group 
most  dependent on government services, and they follow politics with an 
attention  that only the needy can give. 
They will not forget if the Democrats push through cuts in Medicare and 
then  ask for their support in the next election. Their memories are long and 
they  turn out in huge numbers. Until now, these traits have worked to the 
advantage  of the Democrats. Now they are increasingly likely to deliver 
Congress and the  White House to the Republicans. 
checkTextResizerCookie('article_body');  
Morris, a former political adviser to Sen. Trent Lott  (R-Miss.) and 
President Bill Clinton, is the author of "Outrage." To get all of  Dick 
Morris’s 
and Eileen McGann’s columns for free by email, go to _www.dickmorris.com_ 
(http://www.dickmorris.com/) .

Page Printed from:  
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/09/democrats_losing_seniors_98222.html
  at September 09, 2009 - 11:25:01 AM CDT 
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to