Ernie :
Not how I read it. Samuelson says, it seems to me, that the health care  
package
actually packages, are fiscally ruinous. And there also is sleight of  hand 
since
there is a $ 200 billion "rider" that funds increased payments to  doctors
not figured in with debt estimates over the next 10 years.
 
With a few exceptions here and there, the health plans don't cut  costs
and we all will end up paying through the nose since the way things
are written, the Democrats' supporters, the AMA, the insurance industry,  
etc
aren't giving up anything at all, and they are major ( major )  reasons
for runaway health care costs.
 
We could add the GOP supporters like drug companies, I certainly think  we 
should,
but the point is, no matter how anyone looks at it, we are talking  
trillions in new debt.
 
Billy
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 11/16/2009 10:19:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I'm not  sure I see his point. It is almost like he's saying,  "yes the   
health care bill itself isn't too bad, but Congress will inevitably   
pass other legislation that makes things worse."

Sent from my  iPhone

On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:18, [email protected] wrote:

> But  Congress has often prescribed reimbursement cuts that, under  
>  pressure from squeezed providers, it has later  rescinded.

_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to