Ernie :
A few centuries ago ? ? ?
 
It never stops, it is contemporary. Not just Mumbai, but almost weekly,  
somewhere
in India. But even if your criteria is mass killing, its hard to top the 1  
-1/2 million
killed in what is now Bangla Desh in 1971. Hindus then were about 30 %  of
the country, now at about 9 %. 
 
The 20 % tally, or thereabouts, in today's Pakistan, is now in the 2 %  
range.
Most of this difference has been due to flight, and you certainly can't  
blame
the secularized Muslims of Karachi or Islamabad, but the persecutions  are
endless. 
 
Threatens Muslim  /  Hindu ties ?  This assumes these ties  have value.
This is doubtful  ^2.  
 
Sure, in some % of cases there may well be OK relationships, but what is  
the use ?
It is quite possible to look at Muslims generally, even if there are  
exceptions,
as a Quisling population. That being the case..................
 
Granted, there is no excuse for killing 2000 people. This is not in   
dispute.
Also the Gujarat mess some years ago, similar death toll. But for every  
episode
of Hindu revenge there always has been a casus belli which almost  always
is much worse than the Hindu reaction. This includes Bangla Desh in  71,
when about 150,000 Muslims were killed by angry Hindus.
 
As for the mosque / temple dispute, it seems as if archaeologists have  been
at work at the site. Hardly a surprise, there was a Hindu temple there  
previously.
Also no surprise, the Congress Party actively suppresses this information,  
as does
the mainstream India media     -much of which is now  foreign owned anyway.
 
Suppose a mosque or temple was built on the foundation of some historic  
church
like Notre Dame ?  The mosque or temple should stay ? 
 
Like hell.
 
Anyway, when Ayodah was torn down, about  90  still surviving Hindu temples
in Pakistan were either demolished or severely damaged.
 
I hear what you say about those Muslims who are decent people. No  problem
to be sympatico. But I am long past the place where I seek to find  
rationalizations
when other Muslims, apparently the majority, are so utterly different 
and so heinously violent and destructive.
 
My view of the matter
 
Billy
 
======================================================
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 11/24/2009 9:28:43 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Yes, the  Muslims did some horrible things in India a few centuries ago -- 
but that  didn't justify this.

-- Ernie P.

from the November 24, 2009  edition - 
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1124/p06s04-wosc.html
Report on  India mosque destruction threatens Hindu-Muslim ties
A report on the 1992  India mosque destruction, released Tuesday, accuses 
leaders of the Hindu  nationalist BJP of planning one of India's most 
divisive attacks . The report  may inflame Hindu-Muslim relations.

By Mian Ridge | Correspondent of  The Christian Science Monitor

NEW DELHI
A new report on the 1992  destruction of a centuries-old mosque has sparked 
fights in the country's  Parliament and threatens to inflame relations 
between Hindus and  Muslims.

The study, which took 17 years to complete, accuses leaders of  India's 
Hindu nationalist party of planning one of the most communally  divisive events 
in Indian history: the demolition in 1992 of the 16th-century  Babri Masjid 
mosque at the hands of a Hindu mob.

Hindu extremists had  claimed in a concerted campaign that the structure, 
in the northern state of  Uttar Pradesh, was built by Muslim invaders over 
the birthplace of a Hindu  god. Its destruction provoked violent clashes that 
left some 2,000 people  dead.

The event became watershed in modern Indian history, propelling  the Hindu 
nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) – at the time of the attack  a 
small, fringe, rightwing party – into power four years later. It sharply  
exacerbated hostility between Hindus and Muslims and has often been cited as a  
reason for growing extremism among India's often alienated Muslim  minority.

The report by the Justice Liberhan Commission, named after  the retired 
Supreme Court judge who led it, was tabled Tuesday in Parliament,  one day 
after details were leaked by an Indian newspaper. It charges that the  former 
prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and the BJP's current leader, Lal  
Krishna Advani, were involved in planning the mosque's destruction. The party  
has always claimed the attack was the spontaneous initiative of grassroots  
activists.

ALIENATING MUSLIMS
Muslim leaders – including members of  the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind – a leading 
group of Muslim clerics – have called for  the leaders named in the report 
to be prosecuted. Muslim commentators,  meanwhile, warn that inaction is 
likely to alienate India's Muslim community  further.

Kutub Kidwai, from the Institute of Islamic Studies, based in  Mumbai 
(Bombay), says that increasing numbers of young Muslims were being  drawn to 
extremism "because of feelings of alienation." She alluded to the  involvement 
of Indian Muslims in the attacks on Mumbai's Taj hotel last  November.

"The government has to be very wise in that respect," she  continues. 
"People will be looking to the central government to take action –  and many 
also 
remain adamant that the mosque be rebuilt in exactly the same  place."

POLITICAL FALLOUT
The report will damage the BJP, which has  been beset by infighting after 
heavy losses in this year's general election.  Political analysts say its 
poor showing in national polls in April and May  suggest its emphasis on 
Hindutva – literally "Hinduness" – may be losing its  attraction for many 
Indian 
voters.

But the ruling Congress party is  also unlikely to emerge unscathed. At the 
time of the mosque's demolition, the  Congress-led government was accused 
of failing to intervene to save the mosque  and prevent the ensuing violence. 
Days before, it had allowed the gates of the  mosque to be opened to let 
Hindu pilgrims say their prayers at the  site.

But analysts have also speculated that the unveiling of the  long-awaited 
report will also take pressure off the government, which has  faced a noisy 
opposition over all its attempts to get down to business in a  parliament 
session that began last week.

Full HTML version of this  story which may include photos, graphics, and 
related  links

_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


 
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to