Obama seeks stronger ties with  India
 
By _John Pomfret_ 
(http://search.boston.com/local/Search.do?s.sm.query=John+Pomfret&camp=localsearch:on:byline:art)
   

Washington Post / November 25, 2009 
 
 
WASHINGTON - President Obama yesterday welcomed Prime Minister Manmohan  
Singh, who is in Washington for the first state visit under the Obama  
administration, and moved to calm Indian concerns that the United States is  
neglecting the Asian power as it seeks closer ties with China and Pakistan,  
India’
s competitors.
 
“In Asia, Indian leadership is expanding prosperity and the security across 
 the region,’’ Obama said after a two-hour meeting with Singh at the White 
House.  “And the United States welcomes and encourages India’s leadership 
role in  helping to shape the rise of a stable, peaceful, and prosperous  
Asia.’’
 
Obama’s statement appeared crafted to assuage fears in the sometimes 
prickly  nation that his administration is less committed than his 
predecessor’s 
to a  strong relationship with New Delhi. In 2005, President George W. Bush 
signed a  landmark deal committing the United States to cooperating with 
India in the  development of its nuclear power industry, even though India had 
detonated a  nuclear device in 1998 and declined to sign the nuclear 
Non-Proliferation  Treaty.
 
Obama said that the United States will “fully implement’’ the 2005 nuclear 
 accord and that the two countries will cooperate on a “clean-energy  
initiative.’’ The nuclear deal has been held up partly because it is still  
unclear how India will handle uranium provided to it by US nuclear  firms.
 
Indian officials and analysts had expressed concern that during his trip to 
 East Asia last week, Obama failed to mention India in a speech about US 
policy  in the region and appeared to endorse a peacemaking role of sorts for 
China in  India’s relations with Pakistan. India views China as a 
competitor, and Beijing  is a strong backer of Pakistan. The Washington  Post 
recently 
reported that China not only gave Pakistan a blueprint for a  nuclear 
device in the 1970s, it also provided key raw materials to build  one.
 
In statements over the past two days, Singh has joined Obama in emphasizing 
 the values that India and the United States share and the importance of  
democracy in helping the two countries grow closer.
 
In that, said C. Raja Mohan, a Washington-based columnist for the Indian  
Express newspaper, Singh is unique among Indian leaders. “In the past, it was 
 all about post-colonial issues. But Singh has really taken us beyond that,
’’ he  said. “It’s not just that we are poor, Third World, and the West is 
sitting on  us. Singh is signaling that we have a comfort level with the 
United States that  no one else has, and the US should see that.’’
 
In remarks before the Council on Foreign Relations on Monday night, Singh  
took a few not-so subtle swipes at China that sent titters through the 
crowd. He  noted “a certain amount of assertiveness on the part of the 
Chinese’’ 
over  longtime border disputes between the two countries and said that 
while China’s  development has been faster than India’s, “I’ve always believed 
that there are  other values which are more important than the growth of 
the gross domestic  product.’’
 
Among them, he said, are “respect for fundamental human rights, the respect 
 for the rule of law, the respect for multicultural, multi-ethnic,  
multi-religious rights.’’ He also said he believed that policies pushed by a  
democracy would be “far more effective than reforms introduced by the writ of a 
 
ruling group in a non-democratic setup.’’
 
Administration officials have said it was no accident that India was chosen 
 for a state visit. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called it “a show of 
respect for  the value that we put on that relationship.’’
 
Obama also accepted an invitation to visit India next  year.

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to