(http://www.washingtonpost.com/)  

Passing health-care reform will be politically  damaging to the president. 
Not passing it will hurt the  GOP.
 
 
 
 




Obama needs a  health-care exit strategy
By Matthew Dowd
Thursday, December 17, 2009; 
President Obama needs an exit strategy. I am not referring to _Afghanistan_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/afghanistan-pakistan/)  or 
Iraq (though there a quite a few similarities  between the situation Obama is 
in on health-care reform and the political  difficulties President George W. 
Bush faced on Iraq). Congressional Democrats  and Obama are headed toward a 
"catastrophic success" politically if they pass  health-care reform in its 
current legislative form. And catastrophic success was  a term 
then-President Bush used on Iraq when he acknowledged the great initial  
victory but 
didn't take into account the long-term calamity and costs.  
I am not seeking to argue the substance of health care and the merits or  
demerits of the bills, and will leave that to experts in policy and its 
effects.  I am talking about the politics of the legislation and the effect it 
is 
likely  to have on Obama and Democrats in Congress.  
Unlike many other pundits and political experts in both parties, I think 
that  passage of a bill by the Democrats at this point will be politically 
damaging to  both the president and congressional Democrats. Conversely, defeat 
of the  legislation is much more likely to hurt Republicans in Congress.  
The latest _Post-ABC News poll_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/15/AR2009121503717.html)
  shows the president's overall 
approval rating  at a new low of 50 percent -- about the rating President 
Bush had going into the  November 2004 election, when Democrats said Bush was 
ripe to be defeated.  
There are many reasons for this drop in support for Obama. The stagnant  
economy is the biggest factor, but close behind is the fact that the  
administration is pushing health-reform efforts that have polarized the  
electorate, 
and independent and swing voters have moved in large measure against  it.  
As Wednesday's Post-ABC poll shows, a majority of Americans believe that if 
 this bill passes their health-care costs will rise, the federal deficit 
will  increase, the costs of the overall health-care system will climb and 
that their  own care would be better if the system stays as is. Democrats 
(including former  president Bill Clinton) claim that they need this bill to 
pass 
for political  reasons. But let's examine that. At present: A majority of 
Americans are against  the effort, the legislation lacks bipartisan support, 
the costs of the reforms  are upfront and the benefits won't kick in until 
after the 2012 elections. When  has that ever been a formula for political 
success?  
If this legislation passes, Democrats will be held accountable for any  
failures or problems in the system. So if Americans' insurance premiums rise,  
they will blame the Democrats. If patients have to wait in line at emergency 
 rooms, it will be seen as the Democrats' fault. If health-care costs don't 
drop,  the Democrats will face the wrath of the electorate.  
Many Democrats, including people in the administration, blame poor 
marketing  for their difficulties in passing health-care reform. They say they 
haven't  gotten the message out. But advocates of reform have spent millions on 
 
advertising and lobbying this year. And Obama, who many say is the best 
orator  ever to occupy the White House, has pushed for this legislation 
constantly over  the past six months. In that time, support for Obama's 
handling of 
health care  has dropped by more than a net of 30 points.  
Yet before Republicans cheer that they may defeat this effort, they should  
beware what they wish for. A vast majority of Americans still believes that 
we  need fundamental health-care reform. If the legislation fails, 
Democrats can  blame Republicans by saying reform was in sight and they blocked 
it 
without  offering a real alternative in how to decrease costs and increase 
access.  
The dominant issues today are the economy and jobs, and the public doesn't  
see either party making these a real priority. Further, _polls show_ 
(http://www.gallup.com/poll/110458/trust-government-remains-low.aspx)  trust in 
government handling of domestic issues remains  at historic lows. What most 
voters hear from Washington these days is squabbling  over health-care reform 
involving a government role they don't trust and don't  want.  
My advice? Leaders in Washington ought to concentrate on what matters to  
Americans, not on what they think should matter to voters. Come up with a  
health-care bill that draws real bipartisan support. And before pushing a 
bigger  role for government, begin to restore trust in the government's ability 
to do  even small things. Democrats pushing so hard for success on health 
care could  find themselves in a situation resembling former president Bush's 
situation on  Iraq. They could topple the statue and win the day, but lose 
politically over  the coming months and years.  
The writer, a political analyst for ABC News, was the chief strategist for  
George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign.  
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to