(http://www.nypost.com/) 
Updated: Tue., Dec. 29, 2009, 9:40 AM  


 
 
Lying to ourselves
By RALPH PETERS 
Last Updated: 9:40 AM, December 29, 2009 
Posted: 12:45 AM, December 29, 2009 
 
On Christmas Day, an Islamist fanatic tried to blow up an airplane whose  
passengers were mostly Christians. And we helped.  
Our government gets no thanks for preventing a tragedy. Only the bomber's  
ineptitude preserved the lives of nearly 300 innocents.  
How did we help Umar Abdulmutallab, a wealthy Muslim university graduate 
who  decided that Allah wanted him to slaughter Christians on their most 
joyous  holiday?  
By continuing to lie to ourselves. Although willing -- at last -- to 
briefly  use the word "terror," yesterday President Obama still refused to make 
 a 
connection between the action, the date and Islam.  
Was it just a ticketing accident that led to a bombing attempt on 
Christmas?  Was it all about blackout dates and frequent-flyer miles?  
It wasn't. You know it. And I know it. But our government refuses to  know 
it. Despite vast databases crammed with evidence, our leaders -- of both  
parties -- still refuse to connect Islamist terrorism with Islam.  
Our insistence that "Islam's a religion of peace" would have been cold  
comfort to the family members of those passengers had the bomb detonated as  
planned.  
Abdulmutallab's own father warned our diplomats that his son had been  
infected by Islamist extremism. Our diplomats did nothing. Why? Because 
(despite 
 a series of embassy bombings) the State Department dreads linking 
terrorism to  Islam.  
Contrast our political correctness with Abdulmutallab's choice of  
Christmas for his intended massacre. Our troops stand down on Muslim holidays. 
A  
captive terrorist merely has to claim that a soldier dog-eared a Koran, and 
it's  courts-martial all around.  
We proclaim that the terrorists "don't represent Islam." OK, whom do they  
represent? The Franciscans? We don't get to decide what's Islam and  what 
isn't. Muslims do. And far too many of them approve of violent jihad.  
It gets worse. Instead of focusing on the religious zeal and inspiration of 
 our enemies and how such motivations change the game, our "terrorism 
experts"  agonize over whether such beasts as Abdulmutallab or Maj. Hasan, the 
Fort Hood  assassin for Allah, are really members of al Qaeda or not.  
As a Sunday Post editorial pointed out, al Qaeda's far more than a formal  
organization; it's an idea, a cause. If a terrorist says he's al Qaeda, he 
is,  even if he doesn't have a union card from Jihadi Local 632.  
We're dealing with a global Muslim movement, not a Masons' lodge.  
And that "global" aspect is especially worrying. Despite limited Special  
Operations strikes beyond our recognized combat zones, we still don't accept 
the  nature of the threat from jet-set jihadis. Our leaders and our military 
are  obsessed with holding ground in Afghanistan -- even though al Qaeda's 
growth  areas are in Yemen and Africa.  
We voluntarily tie ourselves down, while our enemies focus on mobility.  
Worse, we've convinced ourselves that development aid (the left's all-purpose  
medicine) is the key to defeating al Qaeda.  
That's utter nonsense. Abdulmutallab's a rich kid. He didn't come  from a 
deprived background, bearing the grievances of the slum. He's a graduate  of 
a top English university. And Osama bin Laden's from a super-rich  family. 
How does building a footbridge in Afghanistan deter them?  
Most of our home-grown Islamist terrorists hail from middle-class families 
--  such monsters as Maj. Hasan or the Virginia virgin-chasers under arrest 
in  Pakistan (where jail conditions are a lot worse than at Guantanamo --  
can't we just leave 'em there?).  
This isn't a revolt of the wretched of the earth. These terrorists are the  
Muslim-fanatic versions of Bill Ayers and the Weathermen, pampered kids 
unhappy  with the world. Al Qaeda's big guns are re- belling against privilege. 
 There's a lot of Freud in this fundamentalism.  
Spoiled brats remade their god in their own vengeful image. And we have to  
kill them. This one really is a zero-sum game.  
We're not just fighting men but a plague of faith. Until Washington accepts 
 that, we'll continue to reap a low return on our investments of blood and  
treasure.  
On Christmas Day, a Muslim fanatic attempted to butcher hundreds of  
Christians (dead Jews would've been a bonus). Our response? Have airport  
security 
analyze the contents of grandma's mini-bottle of shampoo -- we don't  want 
to "discriminate."  
With our lies, self-deception and self-flagellation, we're terror's little  
helpers.  
Ralph Peters' latest book is "The War After  Armageddon."




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to