Ernie:
Its not just me who can be curmudgeonly.  :-)
 
But, yeah, there was a sort of tacky quality to Hume's " preachment "
I still admire Mr Hume, but what he said has the earmarks of
someone who is trying his wings, as it were, as an evangelizing
Christian believer.  Years and years as a news analyst, never  able
to openly express his inner soul adequately.  It takes time to  learn
how to do this in a good way on a consistent basis.
 
Don't ask me how I know, I just do, learned it the hard way.
And even then I still screw up  every so often.
 
The only thing that really disturbs me is the ( unintended )  belittling
of Buddhism. Maybe it is true that Christian faith offers a superior
opening to redemption when forgiveness is most needed,  my  feeling
is that it does, but the question concerns "the whole package," if you  
will.
 
Would Woods be better off  --all respects--  by converting to  Christian 
faith
or better off by returning to his Buddhist roots and, maybe for the first  
time
in 20 years, really  trying to live like an actual Buddhist seeking  not 
only
forgiveness in some form, but the deepest possible understanding of  what
he has done and what he now must do in order to repair the damages
and start life again ?
 
As someone who feels strongly about both the value and truth of Christian  
faith
as well as Buddhism, I really don't have a good answer.
 
Billy
 
------------------------------------------------
 
 
In a message dated 1/5/2010 10:48:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

While  Mr. Hume arguably wins the tacky award of the week, at least  
he's  gutsy enough to broach the topic of comparative relgion. I'd  
think  you'd be grateful. :-)

E
Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 5, 2010,  at 10:38, [email protected] wrote:

> Anyway, what do you say to someone  who has gotten embroiled in a sex  
> scandal
> the way Tiger  Woods did ?  And if you say something in favor of your  
> own  faith
> in contrast to another faith,  isn't it a high  responsibility to be  
> as accurate in your
> remarks as  much as it is possible for you to be   ?

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing  list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/




_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to