Not sure what to make of this. The author doesn't understand our view of  
RC,
but  --for the moment , anyway--  maybe this is a good thing. The  
interpretation
presented here of what RC is all about does have the merit of   starting
from a fresh perspective.
 
Our cafeteria approach to politics, really crucial to most of us ( pick and 
 choose
as a high virtue ) is missed, however,  as is the East Coast ( New  America 
Foundation )
"think outside the box:" approach, which, for each of us is what we are all 
 about.
But this new approach has other virtues that seem to be worth  discussion
down the line. Very thoughtful stuff.
 
Billy
 
===============================================
 
 
 
_The Mocking  Eye_ (http://www.mockingeye.com/) 
‘Tis all in vain?

 (http://www.mockingeye.com/index.php/events/)  
 
 
 
Radical Centrism
 
You are trying to decide what policy best helps the environment, or how to  
improve the lot of the poor, or maybe you just need to know how to vote in 
the  primaries. 
Let’s have a look at the field: the right is too religious, war-mongering,  
corporatist and at times overly naive. The left is too socialist, bleeding  
heart, protectionist, and at times overly pessimistic. Libertarians are too 
 crazy, sociopathic, self-centered, and at all times overly utopian. And 
those  are just three of the biggest ones. 
Of course,these are generalization, and don’t apply to large swathes of the 
 demographics represented by these labels. But there are fundamental 
problems  with all these world-views, as well as any others that choose a way 
to 
view the  world and their favourite method to tackle its problems before 
doing anything  else. 
Introducing Radical Centrism. My conception of the idea is a  little bit 
similar to the _radical center_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_center_(politics))  movement, but differs 
in what makes it  radical. The movement’s 
name is derived from “radical” indicating  “extreme”. My Radical Centrism 
takes its name from the  non-political meaning of the term which arose from 
the latin “radix” meaning  “root”. Thus, Radical Centrism views the 
problems of political  ideologies to be buried deep with their very roots–their 
base assumptions and  methodologies. 
Radical Centrism holds these positive values: 
    1.  Reason  
This is the method by which any ideas must be described and deliberated.   
    2.  Patience  
Rushing into decisions usually has more dire consequences than being too  
late. 
    3.  Compassion  
It is better to do something that helps someone than something that doesn’t 
 hurt anyone. 
And pledges these negative ones: 
    1.  No Assumptions  
A problem cannot have any axioms. Priors must be dealt with according to  
positive considerations above. 
    2.  No Axis  
Locating oneself on any ideological axis when solving a problem introduces  
invisible assumptions that will prevent arriving at a preferable solution. 
    3.  No Conclusions  

Never make final decisions. Always be ready to update your priors and your  
solutions. 



_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to