Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:13, [email protected] wrote:

Only if you become the swami for the local Hindu temple.

Actually, they probably wouldn't mind. I suspect few attendees go to temple for the sermons. As long as I look the part, I wonder if anyone would notice...


Sent from my iDeskTop

==================================================

In a message dated 2/12/2010 9:09:16 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: On the plus side, this would allow you to become imam of the local mosque. :-)

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:52, [email protected] wrote:



U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Christian Student Clubs Can Prefer Christian Leaders





By Kathleen Gilbert

SAN DIEGO, February 11, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Scores of Christian and religious organizations have filed at least 21 amicus curiae briefs supporting the Christian Legal Society (CLS) against a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the society's right to select Christian leaders for its group at a University campus.

The case, filed against University of California Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco, will essentially test whether law schools can deny official recognition to student chapters of the Christian Legal Society.

While CLS welcomes anyone to attend meetings and events, it requires that the officers and voting members who provide direction for the Society agree with and abide by the group’s Statement of F aith. UC Hastings considers CLS’s faith requirement to be in confl ict with the school’s non-discrimination policies.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of UC Hastings, relying on one of the Ninth Circuit’s earlier rulings that had bar red a Christian high school club from requiring that its leaders a ffirm a statement of faith. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted CLS's request to appeal that decision in December.

The Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) submitted an amicus curiae brief for the case last Thursday, arguing that UC Hastings’ action s are inconsistent with prior Supreme Court freedom of speech and association rulings.

“Once again, the Ninth Circuit is out of step with other federal c ourts around the country, which have upheld the common-sense princ iple that a Christian or other faith-based student club should be able to have members and leadership who agree with and abide by th eir statement of faith and exclude those who do not," commented PJ I affiliate attorney Pete Lepiscopo, the author of the brief. "Th e implications of this case are far reaching.”

“Freedom of speech includes freedom of association," said Brad Dac us, president of Pacific Justice Institute.

"It would be absurd to demand that an atheist student club allow people of faith to become officers, or that the Democratic student club allow itself to be overrun with Republicans," said Dacus. "Such rules would quickly destroy the identity of these and countless other groups, leading to intellectual dullness, not diversity.

"In the same way, we think it is self-evident that the Christian Legal Society should have the ability to choose Christian leaders for itself."


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
=

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to