Centroids :
There are a variety of problems with this study, not  least overuse of the 
word "will"
when discussing future possibilities. And any serious  discussion of 
population trends
that doesn't mention India, Africa, and South America is  hardly adequate. 
But,
such problems mentioned, the study is very  suggestive.
 
Why AOL actually provided this kind of serious content is  a good question.
AOL's news service is , at the 99% level, fluff, heavy on  superficialities
and consumerism, and otherwise is worthless, so why  this thoughtful item ?
Anyone's guess is as good as mine.
 
In fairness, even the problems with the article may be  misplaced, this is
part of a book, after all, and maybe the author discusses  India or Nigeria
or Brazil elsewhere. And what the author does  say , in any case, makes
some valid points. 
 
FYI
 
Billy
============================

Opinion: What America Will Look Like 
in 2050
 
 
 



Joel Kotkin 
 
Special to AOL News 
 
(March 15) -- To many observers, America's place  in the world is almost 
certain to erode in the decades ahead. Yet if we look  beyond the short-term 
hardship, there are many reasons to believe that America  will remain 
ascendant well into the middle decades of this century.

And  one important reason is people.


________________________

America  in 2050 -- Part 1
This is the first of a three-part series for AOL  News adapted from Joel 
Kotkin's new book, _"The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050."_ 
(http://joelkotkin.com/content/0091-next-hundred-million-america-2050)  Part 2 
in the  
series will look at America's increasingly multiracial population in 2050.
________________________
 


>From 2000 to 2050, the U.S. will add another 100  million to its 
population, based on census and other projections, putting the  country on a 
growth 
track far faster than most other major nations in the world.  And with that 
growth -- driven by a combination of higher fertility rates and  immigration 
-- will come a host of relative economic and social  benefits.

More fertile

Of course the percentage  of childless women is rising here as elsewhere, 
but compared to other advanced  countries, America still boasts the highest 
fertility rate: 50 percent higher  than Russia, Germany or Japan, and well 
above that of China, Italy, Singapore,  Korea and virtually all of eastern 
Europe.

As a result, while the U.S.  population is growing, Europe and Japan are 
seeing their populations stagnate --  and are seemingly destined to eventually 
decline. Russia's population could be  less than a third of the U.S. by 
2050, driven down by low birth and high  mortality rates. Even Prime Minister 
Vladimir Putin has spoken of "the serious  threat of turning into a decaying 
nation."


Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Database.


In East Asia, fertility is particularly low in  highly crowded cities such 
as Tokyo, Shanghai, Tianjin, Beijing and Seoul. And  China's one-child 
policy -- and a growing surplus of males over females -- has  set the stage for 
a 
rapidly aging population by mid-century. South Korea,  meanwhile, has 
experienced arguably the fastest drop in fertility in world  history, which 
perhaps explains its extraordinary, if scandal-plagued, interest  in human 
cloning.

Even more remarkably, America will expand its  population in the midst of a 
global demographic slowdown. Global population  growth rates of 2 percent 
in the 1960s have dropped to less than half that rate  today, and this 
downward trend is likely to continue -- falling to less than 0.8  percent by 
2025 
-- largely due to an unanticipated drop in birthrates in  developing 
countries such as Mexico and Iran. These declines are in part the  result of 
increased urbanization, the education of women and higher property  prices. The 
world's population, according to some estimates, could peak as early  as 2050 
and begin to fall by the end of the century.

Younger and  More Vibrant

Population growth has very different effects on  wealthy and poor nations. 
In the developing world, a slowdown of population  growth can offer at least 
short-term economic and environmental benefits. But in  advanced countries, 
a rapidly aging or decreasing population does not bode well  for societal 
or economic health, whereas a growing one offers the hope of  expanding 
markets, new workers and entrepreneurial innovation.

In fact,  throughout history, low fertility and socioeconomic decline have 
been  inextricably linked, creating a vicious cycle that affected such 
once-vibrant  civilizations as ancient Rome and 17th-century Venice and that 
now 
affects  contemporary Europe , Russia and Japan.

Within the next four decades,  most of the developed countries in both 
Europe and East Asia will become  veritable old-age homes: a third or more of 
their populations will be older than  65, compared with only a fifth in the 
U.S. By 2050, roughly 30 percent of  China's population will be older than 60, 
according to the United Nations. The  U.S. will have to cope with an aging 
population and lower population growth, in  relative terms, but it will 
maintain a youthful, dynamic  demographic.

More Hopeful About the Future

The  reasons behind these diverging trends is complex. In some countries, a 
sense of  diminished prospects, combined with a chronic lack of space, 
appear to be the  root causes for plunging birthrates. As Italians, Germans, 
Japanese, Koreans and  Russians have fewer offspring -- one recent survey found 
that only half of  Italian women 16 to 24 said they wanted to have children 
-- they will have less  concern for future generations.

In contrast, in the United States roughly  three-quarters of young people 
report they plan to have offspring. Such  individual decisions suggest that 
America, for all its problems, is diverging  from its prime competitors, 
placing its faith in a future that can accommodate  100 million more people.

As author Michael Chabon recently wrote, "In  having children, in 
engendering them, in loving them, in teaching them to love  and care about the 
world," parents are "betting" that life can be better for  them and their 
progeny

Joel Kotkin is a  distinguished presidential fellow at _Chapman University_ 
(http://www.chapman.edu/)  in Orange, Calif., and an adjunct fellow  with 
the _Legatum Institute_ (http://www.li.com/)  in  London.


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to