Barry :
Glad you are back among the living again. Too bad the reason is  what it is,
but months ago I gave up hope that anything I might say would  make one iota
of difference as far as the health care bill goes.
 
Public opinion, at least according to one poll I have seen is about 48 %  
against,
approximately 40% in favor. Therefore we got it anyway.
 
For me the tragedy is that a good health care bill would have had me  
cheering
at the outcome. This one isn't all bad, but, damn, it is so flawed that it  
is
an embarrassment.
 
One reason I'm a Radical Centrist. This time I think the Dems deserve  most 
of
the blame, but the GOP was hardly "all good" in the matter, either. As per  
usual
we get shafted from both directions.
 
We need a new political party.
 
Billy
 
========================================================
 
 
In a message dated 3/22/2010 2:02:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

After 4  weeks of having my left arm in a cast due to me falling off a
ladder and  breaking my wrist, I cannot stand it any more.  Finally
regained the  use of my fingers enough to get back into the fray and boy,
there are  things I have wanted to say for the past  weeks!!

Healthcare.....

Here is my take in a letter to the RG,  EW.....






Even before retiring to bed Sunday  night I knew I would have nightmares.
The passage of the healthcare reform  bill is not a wonderful dream come
to fruition but a dark time for the  future of all Americans.  Another
1Billion added to the already  monstrous debt accrued under Obama, no
meaningful reform of the true  villain, the insurance companies (and the
AMA) and most heinous of all, the  requirement which forces everyone,
under penalty of some kind of punishment  to buy health insurance. 
Supporters claim it’s no different than auto  insurance requirements, I
say phooey on you.  Your health cannot be  compared to driving a car, one
is an absolute necessity, the other a  tolerated privilege.  There is,
buried in the over 1000 pages of the  bill a provision called a "hardship
waiver" for those who really cannot  afford the legal requirements, no
mention however of how many hoops one  must jump through to get that
coveted waiver.  As one currently  unemployed and collecting unemployment
until it runs out at the end of the  year, how do I get coverage?  No
mention in the bill about this.   Will they tax my benefits to pay for
healthcare, along with the IRS who  takes from my unemployment check each
week?  Will I have to become  homeless to get healthcare?  Too many
questions and not enough  answers.  I am very afraid.
The new motto of the Wellness Police will  be "To sleep, sleep and dream
the dreams of kings, as long as your policy  is up to date and legal."



Just one mans opinion.

Glad to  be back.....sort of.

Barry









>  Ernie:
> Token "socialist," yes, but a Saint-Simonian not a Marxist (  "neo" or
> anything else ).
> Saint-Simonianism refers to what  might better be called
> Capitalist-Socialist,
> a hybrid system  that seeks public good through a blend of private
> enterprise
>  and elected officials who take their responsibilities for the people   
they
> represent seriously ( objectively ) rather than  ideologically.
>
> But about the current bill, to be candid about  it, it seems to me to be
> excessively
> partisan. Do we need  health care reform ? We have needed it since the era
> of FDR.
>  But it would have been far better to seek market solutions as much as
>  possible
> instead of essentially as Democratic concessions to the GOP.  Such as
> creating
> competition among insurance companies by  allowing choice of health  plans
> across state lines. This seems  so totally obvious that it boggles the
> mind
> that it wasn't  done. But where was discussion on the objective merits  ?
> The  Democrats didn't seem able to do any such thing because
> of their  mindset.
>
> This said, a public option was also called for, which  I have always
> regarded as
> absolutely necessary, and about that  the Democrats fought each other
> to such an extent that it became  impossible given Republican
> opposition. That opposition struck me as  utterly perverse.
>
> Bottom line, along the way I became so  disgusted with the whole  process
> that I eventually tuned it out  almost completely since whatever came  of
> the debate
> it  would be  capitulation to special interests , little conservative
>  input, and
> what you'd expect from lawyers.
>
> And what  the hell do student loans have to do with health care ?
>
> Is the  bill better than nothing ?  I suppose so, but is that  the  best
> that
> could be done ?
> What a joke and what an  insult to the whole country. But you'd never know
> it
> from  media accounts which, true to form, are praising the result as
>  salvific.
>
> We got a compromise .A bad compromise at that.  Essentially Congress makes
> me sick
> --for which the health care  bill provides no remedy.
>
> Billy
>
>  =======================================================
>
> In a  message dated 3/22/2010 10:01:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>  [email protected] writes:
>
>
> I tend to  agree  that whatever its political significance, the current
>  bill
> is a non-event in  terms of truly transforming health care  delivery.  We
> can only hope that  whatever happens will  encourage rather than 
discourage
> innovation.
> Billy, you're our  token socialist --  what do you think of the  bill?
>
>
> -- Ernie  P.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Health  Care Reform Passes--Now Let's Start Health Care  Innovation
> Posted  by: Bruce Nussbaum on March 22, 2010
>  To  the surprise of many, Congress passed legislation this weekend  that
> extended  US healthcare to nearly everyone in the country.  Bravo. The US
> joins
> the 19th  century. The next trick is  to try actual innovation in health
> care
> that lowers   costs and increases the healthcare experience for Americans.
> There is  almost  nothing in the bill passed that does that.
> The _US  already  spends far more on healthcare innovation than any other
>  country_ (http://innovationandgrowth.wordpress.com/category/health/) .  
But
> government healthcare R&D has gone into life sciences that  haven’t 
paid
> off
> (genome) or advanced medical procedures  that are extremely expensive and
> help extremely few people. In terms  of longevity, the US lags Europe and
> Asia.
> US  healthcare  needs platform innovation that uses social media to 
connect
>  people  to the medical system in new, cheaper, more personal and  more
> productive  ways. _Hello Health is one way to go._
>  (http://hellohealth.com/patient/)  It’s founder, _Dr. Jay  Parkinson_
> (http://jayparkinsonmd.com/) , has
> just launched_  The Future Well_ (http://thefuturewell.com/) , a design
> consultancy  that promises to extend the new social media model for
>  wellbeing
> across the country.
> US  healthcare also needs  the kind of demassing and decentralization that
> design  and  innovation consultants can provide. _Memorial Sloan-
> Kettering
>  (MSK) did workshops with students at the Parsons School for Design   to
> come
> up with small, inexpensive, neighborhood chemo centers  _
> (http://www.interiordesign.net/article/CA6714455.html) and it  just
> completed the first  in
> Brooklyn.
> The  _Mayo  Clinic is innovating broadly_
>  (http://centerforinnovation.mayo.edu/transform/2009/index.html)  in  
health
> care.
> _Clayton  Christensen has a great book on  The Innovator’s 
Prescription_
>  
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0071592083?ie=UTF8&tag=claytonchrist-20&linkCo
>  de=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0071592083)   that calls 
for
> disruptive innovation  in healthcare based on new  business models. This 
is
> a
> very important book.
>  Now  that the US has extended healthcare to all its citizens, the  next
> step
> is to  cut costs and improve outcomes and  experiences by harnessing the
> best thinking  of designers and  innovators. Most of the concepts and 
tools
> are
> already  at  hand.
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Centroids   mailing list:  [email protected]
>  http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
>  Archives  at  http://radicalcent
>  rism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Centroids mailing  list: [email protected]
>  http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
>  Archives at
>  http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


 
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to