Nice research. Maybe it would be possible to argue with some  particulars,
but I'm not sure what that would prove. To repeat, nice work.
 
Billy
 
============================================================
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/26/2010 8:38:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

_http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11157_ 
(http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=11157) 
_http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97620520_ 
(http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97620520) 
_http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2008-fall/mandatory-health-insur
ance.asp_ 
(http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2008-fall/mandatory-health-insurance.asp)
 
_http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/10/massachusetts-health-program-a-model-for-
obamas-national-reform-strains-state-budget/_ 
(http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/10/massachusetts-health-program-a-model-for-obamas-national-reform-strains
-state-budget/) 
_http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/0
2/mass_healthcare_reform_is_failing_us/_ 
(http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/02/mass_healthcare_reform_is_failing
_us/) 
_http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124726287099225209.html_ 
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124726287099225209.html) 

Faulty  memory of details. 

Article 1 is about how Mass. implemented their  "individual mandate" and 
then over-charged young people. Unintended  consequence: 60 % fewer young 
people moving to Mass. 

Article 2 is  about the doctor shortage that you wind up with when you 
insure everyone and  try to make it relatively "cheap." Also, as you cut the 
pay 
to primary care  doctors or overload them with clients, they tend to leave 
the state or retire.  

Article 3 was one I just found, and I know nothing of the source (The  
Objective Standard? Well, maybe). 

Article 4 comes from the DC Daily  Caller, founded by Tucker Carlson. 

Article 5 is from last year and the  Boston Globe.

Article 6 is from the WSJ last July, entitled "The  Massachusetts Health 
Mess."  

Cato is libertarian, and I'm sure  you are familiar with NPR. (AKA in 
Dallas as National Progressive Radio.)  

David

 
"A  pleasant natural environment is a good - a luxury good, philosophical 
good, a  moral goody-good, a good time for all. Whatever, we want it. If we 
want  something, we should pay for it, with our labor or our cash. We 
shouldn't beg  it, steal it, sit around wishing for it, or euchre the 
government 
into taking  it by force."--P. J.  O’Rourke  


On  3/25/2010 11:39 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  
David :
No idea where you get your information about the Mass health care plan  
going broke.
Romney was on the tube the other night bragging about the plan. Of  course, 
he isn't exactly
an unbiased source, but you'd think he would not have done so if the  plan 
was
in serious trouble.
 
I looked for some kind of confirmation of your comment. Maybe there is  
such,
but I could not find anything.
 
As for Oregon,  there are good years and there are bad years. When  the 
state has 
budget shortfalls they trim benefits and limit enrollments. One year  there 
was a freeze on new
sign-ups and people were only admitted via a lottery system  Those  already 
in the plan
were not effected. 
 
OK, it isn't perfect, Oregon also must maintain some kind of budget  
discipline.
But it is literally a lifesaver and a far better way to use public  
revenues than to
prop up banks and funnel hundreds of billions to Wall Street.
 
For me the questions isn't whether public health is good, but how to  keep 
it
solvent once we get it. The whole society benefits when everyone is  
physically
healthy. And at the low end of the income spectrum there simply is no  way
in hell for minimum wage workers, or even  anyone somewhat better  off,
to afford health care  
 
Hospitals like it, at least in principle, since ER services are  reimbursed
by the state and the hospitals don't need to swallow the costs.
 
But what angers me isn't public health, but price gouging up and down  the 
line
in the health services field. And the greed of some ( by no means all,  but 
some )
doctors and other medical professionals. 
 
I mean, you can't blame Uncle Sam for more than a fraction of the  rising 
costs
of health care in the USA. And I doubt if you think that 17% of  the economy
ought to be spent on medical care when other countries are able to  keep
such costs in  the 10 % range. And its not just health providers  per se,
but also drug companies, or especially them.
 
Greed as a motivation for going into health services strikes me
as grossly immoral. Just as it would be for cops or teachers or
100 other professions.
 
Billy
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
A little about the OHP, from Wikipedia --
 
 
 
The Oregon Health Plan was conceived and realized by  _emergency room_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_room)  _doctor_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physician)  _John Kitzhaber_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kitzhaber) , then a  _state senator_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_State_Senate) ,_[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-WWsickness-0)  and 
Dr. Ralph  Crawshaw, a Portland activist._[2]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-1)  [  Kitzhaber was 
gov for 2 
terms  ]
 
It was intended to make health care more available to the working poor,  
while rationing benefits._[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-WWsickness-0)  At 
the time,  Oregon was considered a national 
leader in _health care  reform_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_reform) ._[3]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-2)  
The law passed  in Oregon was not initially compatible with federal law, so a 
waiver was  needed. President _Bill Clinton_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton)  approved  the plan on March 20, 
1993, though he required a 
revision to the plan due to  a concern about whether disabled people would have 
equal access._[4]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-NYTapprove-3)  At 
the time,  Medicaid covered 240,000 Oregonians._[4]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-NYTapprove-3)  
In 1994, the plan's first year of operation, nearly 120,000 new members  
signed up, and bad debts at Portland hospitals dropped 16%._[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-WWsickness-0)  
The plan's costs increased from $1.33 billion in 1993-1995 to $2.36  
billion in 1999-2001._[1]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-WWsickness-0)  
Significant  cuts were made to the Oregon Health Plan's 
budget in 2003._[5]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-4)  
New enrollment in the program were closed from mid-2004_[6]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-codered-5)  until 
early  2008, 
when a lottery-based system was introduced. Tens of thousands of  Oregonians 
signed up, competing for 3,000 new spots in the plan._[7]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-6) _[8]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-7)  
The Oregon Health Plan was expanded to cover 80,000 uninsured children  
through legislation that passed in 2009. _[9]_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan#cite_note-8)  The program has  
enrolled 38,000 additional 
children through February, 2010.


_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 

Archives at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 

  



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to