Sometimes CNN is OK, but the emphasis has to be on the "some" part of  
sometimes.
They can't count when they don't want to count. But the "they"isn't always  
the same
people. CNN has too many of those and not enough of the others.
 
Plus the high honchos can't seem to get their priorities right.
 
About 10 days or even two weeks after everyone else had relegated the
Haiti earthquake story to back burner, for instance, CNN was still
treating it as front page news. Was it ?  How relevant is Haiti  for
most Americans ?
 
Sure, the quake was a great tragedy. But was it significantly worse than  
Chile ?
Yet the Chile story came and went in a week, if that. Haiti was a top  CNN 
story
for a month. To what purpose ?  To show solidarity with BHO ?   Guess they
can do that if they want to, but looks like viewers didn't agree.
 
Billy
 
=====================================================
 
 
In a message dated 3/30/2010 8:06:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

One reason is this: CNN said that "hundreds of  people, at least dozens" 
were at the Tea Party Rally in Searchlight, Nevada.  

Get a load of the aerial picture: 

 
(http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/searchlight-tp.jpg)
 _CNN  can't count._ 
(http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/searchlight-tp.jpg)
 

David

 
"A  pleasant natural environment is a good - a luxury good, philosophical 
good, a  moral goody-good, a good time for all. Whatever, we want it. If we 
want  something, we should pay for it, with our labor or our cash. We 
shouldn't beg  it, steal it, sit around wishing for it, or euchre the 
government 
into taking  it by force."--P. J.  O’Rourke  


On  3/30/2010 1:26 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  
 
March 30th, 2010
_The  Carnage Continues at CNN_ 
(http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2010/03/30/the-carnage-continues-at-cnn/)
 
Posted by  Tom Bevan 
 
 
_Bill   Carter_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30cnn.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1269950584-NiM/J5UkUTxGG7MygHaImw)
  of the New York 
Times: 
CNN continued what has become a precipitous decline in ratings for its  
prime-time programs in the first quarter of 2010, with its main hosts  losing 
almost half their viewers in a year. 
The trend in news ratings for the first three months of this year is  all 
up for one network, the Fox News Channel, which enjoyed its best  quarter 
ever in ratings, and down for both MSNBC and CNN. 
CNN had a slightly worse quarter in the fourth quarter of 2009, but the  
last three months have included compelling news events, like the _earthquake 
in  Haiti_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/info/haiti-earthquake-2010/?inline=nyt-classifier)  and 
the battle over health care, and CNN, which  emphasizes its 
hard news coverage, was apparently unable to benefit. 
The losses at CNN continued a pattern in place for much of the last  year, 
as the network trailed its competitors in every prime-time hour.  (CNN still 
easily beats MSNBC in the daytime hours, but those are less  lucrative in 
advertising money, and both networks are far behind Fox News  at all hours.)





_______________________________________________

Centroids mailing list: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 

_http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com) 

Archives at 
_http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/) 

  



_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to