Pardon moi Francaise,
but, damn, Ernie, what a to-the-point really perceptive 
summary and set of conclusions. 
 
What have you been shooting up with lately  ?  Brain steroids ?
 
I have to tell you, though, this guy from MIT, well, 
in the brains department, he is about as good as anyone  gets.
Knows his stuff extremely well, and also ( mirable dictu  )
knows how to communicate like a pro. 
 
If you ever get the chance to listen to him my hunch is  that
you would be as impressed as I was. No rants, no endless  lists
of figures, either, just one excellent example of what  is
going on after another, followed by ( seems to me )  one
after another brilliant logical inference from the  data.
 
In short, the kind of professor to kill for in order  to
get in his class. Well, not that extreme, but
knee-capping would be about right.
 
My humble opinion
Billy
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
Partly, but I think they actually  demonstrate a deeper problem:  
economics as a profession is  intellectually bankrupt. The Left can't  
explain the  success of capitalism, and the Right can't explain it's   
failure.

Political reform is impossible without a robust  understanding of the  
whole problem. That means vibrant academic  communities (not just a few  
individuals) that actually seek to engage  the data on it's own terns,  
instead of projecting existing ideology  onto it.

Absent a "scientific consensus" on what a healthy economy looks  like,  
blaming politicians and financiers for killing the patient may  be  
valid, but futile.






In a message dated 4/6/2010 9:53:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Impressive stuff. I only have one quibble:

Sent from my  iPhone

On Apr 6, 2010, at 20:00, [email protected] wrote:

> More  remarkable, the responses of both the Bush and Obama  
>  administrations to the crisis–bailing out the megabanks on generous   
> terms, without securing any meaningful reform–demonstrate the lastin  
> g political power of Wall Street.

Partly, but I think they  actually demonstrate a deeper problem:  
economics as a profession is  intellectually bankrupt. The Left can't  
explain the success of  capitalism, and the Right can't explain it's   
failure.

Political reform is impossible without a robust  understanding of the  
whole problem. That means vibrant academic  communities (not just a few  
ibdividuals) that actually seek to  engage the data on it's own terns,  
instead of projecting existing  ideology onto it.

Absent a "scientific consensus" on what a healthy  economy looks like,  
blaming politicians and financiers for killing  the patient may be  
valid, but  futile.

E
_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to