HI Billy,

On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:51 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Ernie:
> As you can tell, except to the extent that Shamanism is important to 
> understand
> if you want to know about the origins of religion, or if you have an interest
> in Iroquois or Cherokee culture, I'm not much for oral tradition.

I hadn't noticed, but it makes sense, and explains a few things..

> Guess this could be debated, but
> would it do much good to do so ?

Actually, yeah, as this comes up quite a bit in our discussion of Islam...

> Religion, to me, requires scripture in something like the same way
> the US requires a constitution. Without it,  too much is not dependable
> generation to generation. 


I think this may be your academic bias.  Religious *consistency* may require 
written scripture, but religion in its *essence* certainly does not.

I'll concede that the US *government* needs a constitution in order to function 
effectively and be held accountable.  But if you date the U.S. from 1776 like 
most of us common-folk do, then it doesn't need a constitution to *exist*.

> I'm highly suspicious of oral tradition. That's the bottom line.
> Plenty of troubles with "literary religion," nobody needs to tell me,
> but, again, it is like having a constitution to appeal to.

Fair enough, but it does seem inaccurate/unfair/condescending to *define* 
religion as only being Scriptural.

For that matter, what would qualify:
- Buddhism
- Greek mythology
- Norse mythology

?

-- Ernie P.

>  
> Billy
>  
> ================================================
>  
>  
>  
> In a message dated 4/12/2010 10:57:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
> Hi Billy,
> 
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:01 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> > But it seems self-evidently true that if you are religious and
> > take your faith's scriptures seriously as vital to life, you will want to
> > read the texts closely to get full meaning. You will want to know
> > "all the details," and find out the best ways to analyze
> > various sacred writings.
> 
> Interesting.  Presumably that only applies to "literary" religious 
> traditions., right?  I don't think animism or earth-worship benefits literacy 
> as much.
> 
> -- Ernie P.
> 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
> http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
> Archives at 
> http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
> http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
> Archives at 
> http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to