David Petraeus for president in 2012?
If General David Petraeus ends America’s two longest wars on a  victorious 
note, the call to make a presidential run in 2012 may be hard to  resist.
  
____________________________________

  
____________________________________

 
    *   CSMonitor

By _John  Hughes_ 
(http://www.csmonitor.com/About/Contact/Staff-Writers/John-Hughes)  / April 15, 
2010  
Provo, Utah  
Enter a new potential candidate for the presidency of the United States. He 
 is four-star Gen. David Petraeus, whose military tactics have crushed a  
democracy-threatening insurgency in Iraq, and whose tactical game plan in  
Afghanistan may do the same there. 
 
 
 
    *   



Well, you may say, Americans are not particularly cordial to the idea of a  
general in the White House. The last one was Gen. Dwight Eisenhower. Gen. 
Colin  Powell toyed with the prospect and decided against it. _Gen.  Wesley 
Clark_ (http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1212/p01s03-uspo.html)  sought the 
Democratic nomination in 2004 and failed. 
Petraeus disavows any political ambitions. Even Col. Erik Gunhus, a former  
Special Forces officer and now Petraeus’s public affairs adviser, who 
spends 15  or 16 hours a day watching and traveling with Petraeus, says the man 
is not  interested. What he really enjoys is schmoozing with intellectuals in 
 mind-expanding discussions. 
Petraeus is no mean intellectual himself. He graduated from the US Military 
 Academy at West Point in the top 5 percent of his class, married the  
superintendent’s daughter, taught for two years at West Point’s social sciences 
 department, and picked up master’s and PhD degrees at Princeton. 
A lithe physical-fitness buff (he challenges young soldiers to push-up  
contests and usually wins), he has held a string of combat as well as staff  
assignments. He led the 101st Airborne Division (Screaming Eagles) in Iraq  
before becoming overall commander of US and allied forces there. Now he is  
commander of the US Central Command, embracing some of the most dangerous  
countries in the world, including Iraq and Afghanistan. 
Petraeus may be a soldier-scholar, but he has always responded to the call 
of  duty. If he indeed becomes the victorious mastermind behind America’s 
two  longest wars, and his countrymen told him they need him to lead the 
nation as  president, it would be hard for him to turn a deaf ear to the call. 
In a punishing schedule, Petraeus likes to explain his strategy against  
insurgency at campuses around the country, particularly those with large ROTC  
units. A few weeks ago, he hit Yale, Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire, 
and  Brigham Young University in Utah, in little more than 24 hours. (“It’
s easier  when you’ve got your own airplane,” says an aide.) The choice of 
Saint Anselm  intrigued some political observers because it is sometimes 
chosen as a debate  venue in presidential campaigns. 
Petraeus dismisses any talk of political guile, pointing out that though he 
 is a registered Republican, he has avoided voting in recent elections to 
negate  any question of partisanship. 
What he is enthusiastic about is the successful counterinsurgency tactic he 
 employed in Iraq and which he now is implementing in Afghanistan. In a few 
of  his words, it is: “You cannot kill or capture your way out of an  
industrial-strength insurgency.” It requires a combined military and civilian  
effort. The ground must be prepared with economic and educational and medical  
programs capturing the support of the civilian population. They must be  
confident that the military can protect them once the insurgents are driven 
out.  Once the ground is prepared, Petraeus says, “Then we take the fight to 
the  enemy. There is no gain in taking the fight to the enemy if the 
population there  has no faith in a secure future.” 
Part of the _Petraeus strategy_ 
(http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2010/0127/Afghanistan-war-Good-counterinsurgency-like-good-politics-i
s-local)  is the emphasis on avoiding civilian  casualties. His soldiers 
are ordered not to shoot if the number of civilian  casualties is likely to be 
substantial. Never engage, he orders, if the number  of enemies made by the 
action outnumbers the “bad guys” you take out. 
At 57, Petraeus is young enough to embark on a political career when many 
of  his college-age listeners are at their prime voting age. The ROTC cadets 
of  today, as Petraeus says, could be commanding troops in action in foreign 
 countries. 
If the Petraeus strategy has brought “victory” in America’s two longest 
wars,  the call to make a presidential run may be hard to  resist.
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to