Real Clear Politics 
April 23, 2010  
The Joy of Losing
By _Charles  Krauthammer_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Charles+Krauthammer&id=14565) 

WASHINGTON -- Among my various idiosyncrasies, such as (twice) driving from 
 Washington to New York to watch a world championship chess match, the most 
 baffling to my friends is my steadfast devotion to the Washington 
Nationals.  When I wax lyrical about having discovered my own private paradise 
at 
Nationals  Park, eyes begin to roll and it is patiently explained to me that 
my Nats have  been not just bad, but prodigiously -- epically -- bad. 
As if I don't know. They lost 102 games in 2008; 103 in 2009. That's no 
easy  feat. Only three other teams in the last quarter-century have achieved  
back-to-back 100-loss seasons. 
Now understand: This is not the charming, cuddly, amusing incompetence of,  
say, the '62 Mets, of whom their own manager, Casey Stengel, famously 
asked,  "Can't anybody here play this game?" -- and whose stone-gloved first 
baseman,  Marv Throneberry, was nicknamed Marvelous Marv, the irony intended as 
a sign of  affection. 
Nor am I talking about heroic, stoic, character-building losing. The 
Chicago  Cubs fan knows that he's destined for a life of Sisyphean suffering 
and  
perpetual angst. These guys go 58 years without winning, then come within 
five  outs of the National League pennant, only to have one of their own fans 
deflect  a ball about to settle into a Cub outfielder's glove, killing the 
play and  bringing on the unraveling. 
The fan was driven into hiding and the fateful ball ritually exorcised, 
blown  to smithereens on TV. Sorry, that's not my kind of losing. Been there. 
I'm a  former Red Sox fan, now fully rehabilitated. No, I don't go to games 
to steel my  spine, perfect my character, journey into the dark night of the 
soul. I get that  in my day job watching the Obama administration in action. 
I go for relief. For the fun, for the craft (beautifully elucidated in 
George  Will's just-reissued classic, "Men at Work") and for the sweet, easy 
cheer at  Nationals Park. 
You get there and the twilight's gleaming, the popcorn's popping, the 
kids're  romping and everyone's happy. The joy of losing consists in this: 
Where 
there  are no expectations, there is no disappointment. In Tuesday night's 
game, our  starting pitcher couldn't get out of the third inning. Gave up 
four straight  hits, six earned runs, and as he came off the mound, actually 
got a few  scattered rounds of applause. 
Applause! In New York he'd have been booed mercilessly. In Philly, he'd 
have  found his car on blocks and missing a headlight. 
No one's happy to lose, and the fans cheer lustily when the Nats win. But 
as  starters blow up and base runners get picked off, there is none of the  
agitation, the angry, screaming, beer-spilling, red-faced ranting you get at  
football or basketball games. 
Baseball is a slow, boring, complex, cerebral game that doesn't lend itself 
 to histrionics. You "take in" a baseball game, something odd to say about 
a  football or basketball game, with the clock running and the bodies 
flying. 
And for a losing baseball team, the calm is even more profound. I've never  
been to a park where the people are more relaxed, tolerant and appreciative 
of  any small, even moral, victory. Sure, you root, root, root for the home 
team,  but if they don't win "it's a shame" -- not a calamity. Can you 
imagine  arm-linked fans swaying to such a sweetly corny song of early 
20th-century  innocence -- as long gone as the manual typewriter and the 
20-game 
winner -- at  the two-minute warning? 
But now I fear for my bliss. Hope, of a sort, is on the way -- in the form 
of  Stephen Strasburg, the greatest pitching prospect in living memory. His 
fastball  clocks 103 mph and his slider, says Tom Boswell, breaks so sharply 
it looks like  it hit a bird in midair. In spring training, center fielder 
Nyjer Morgan  nicknamed him Jesus. Because of the kid's presence, persona, 
charisma? Nope.  Because "that's what everybody says the first time they see 
Strasburg throw,"  explained Morgan. "Jeeee-sus." 
But now I'm worried. Even before Strasburg has arrived from the minor  
leagues, the Nats are actually doing well. They're playing .500 ball for the  
first time in five years. They are hovering somewhere between competent  
mediocrity and respectability. When Jesus arrives -- my guess is late May --  
they might actually be good. 
They might soon be, gasp, a contender. In the race deep into September. 
Good  enough to give you hope. And break your heart. 
Where does one then go for respite?
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to