I would have expected maybe a 10% or 15% difference, but the really  large
discrepancies were startling. Huge weakness for conservatives to  exploit
if they see the opening. What this does is to discredit the economic  
positions
of the Left. At least at the popular level.
 
There also is a paradox. And I think it is because of assumptions  made
in the survey / test. The fixation of the Right with free trade is utterly  
dysfunctional.
Yet the kind of economic illiteracy which would reveal that weakness  isn't
caught by the questions asked.
 
Somewhere along the way there also is a paradox,  why some  Leftist 
economists
are World Class by anyone's reckoning. Kuttner, Krugman, Thurow, etc,
not to mention Keynes. How does the Left, despite the economic  illiteracy
of Left majorities , also inspire superlative economic thought ?
 
Billy
 
===========================================
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/8/2010 10:38:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Good! I  read this in the paper this morning and I was to busy to go
and get the  link but I am glad you posted this. Interesting but  not
surprising.

// Lennart


On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:33  PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> WSJ   /   June 8, 2010
>
> Are You Smarter Than a Fifth  Grader?
>
> Self-identified liberals and Democrats do badly on  questions of basic
> economics.
>
> By DANIEL B.  KLEIN
>
> Who is better informed about the policy choices facing  the country—
liberals,
> conservatives or libertarians? According to a  Zogby International survey
> that I write about in the May issue of Econ  Journal Watch, the answer is
> unequivocal: The left flunks Econ  101.
>
> Zogby researcher Zeljka Buturovic and I considered the  4,835 respondents'
> (all American adults) answers to eight survey  questions about basic
> economics. We also asked the respondents about  their political leanings:
> progressive/very liberal; liberal; moderate;  conservative; very
> conservative; and libertarian.
>
>  Rather than focusing on whether respondents answered a question  
correctly,
> we instead looked at whether they answered incorrectly. A  response was
> counted as incorrect only if it was flatly  unenlightened.
>
> Consider one of the economic propositions in  the December 2008 poll:
> "Restrictions on housing development make  housing less affordable." 
People
> were asked if they: 1) strongly  agree; 2) somewhat agree; 3) somewhat
> disagree; 4) strongly disagree;  5) are not sure.
>
> Basic economics acknowledges that whatever  redeeming features a 
restriction
> may have, it increases the cost of  production and exchange, making goods 
and
> services less affordable.  There may be exceptions to the general case, 
but
> they would be  atypical.
>
> Therefore, we counted as incorrect responses of  "somewhat disagree" and
> "strongly disagree." This treatment gives  leeway for those who think the
> question is ambiguous or half right and  half wrong. They would likely 
answer
> "not sure," which we do not count  as incorrect.
>
> In this case, percentage of conservatives  answering incorrectly was 
22.3%,
> very conservatives 17.6% and  libertarians 15.7%. But the percentage of
> progressive/very liberals  answering incorrectly was 67.6% and liberals
> 60.1%. The pattern was  not an anomaly.
>
> The other questions were: 1) Mandatory  licensing of professional services
> increases the prices of those  services (unenlightened answer: disagree). 
2)
> Overall, the standard of  living is higher today than it was 30 years ago
> (unenlightened answer:  disagree). 3) Rent control leads to housing 
shortages
> (unenlightened  answer: disagree). 4) A company with the largest market 
share
> is a  monopoly (unenlightened answer: agree). 5) Third World workers 
working
>  for American companies overseas are being exploited (unenlightened  
answer:
> agree). 6) Free trade leads to unemployment (unenlightened  answer: 
agree).
> 7) Minimum wage laws raise unemployment (unenlightened  answer: disagree).
>
> More on Politics
>
> Primaries  to Watch From Coast to Coast
> Candidates Target Rivals' Wall Street  Ties
> Map: Congressional Contests
> Interactive: Battle for the  Senate | House
> 2010 Governors Races
>
> How did the six  ideological groups do overall? Here they are, best to 
worst,
> with an  average number of incorrect responses from 0 to 8: Very
> conservative,  1.30; Libertarian, 1.38; Conservative, 1.67; Moderate, 
3.67;
> Liberal,  4.69; Progressive/very liberal, 5.26.
>
> Americans in the first  three categories do reasonably well. But the left 
has
> trouble squaring  economic thinking with their political psychology, 
morals
> and  aesthetics.
>
> To be sure, none of the eight questions  specifically challenge the 
political
> sensibilities of conservatives  and libertarians. Still, not all of the 
eight
> questions are tied  directly to left-wing concerns about inequality and
> redistribution. In  particular, the questions about mandatory licensing, 
the
> standard of  living, the definition of monopoly, and free trade do not
> specifically  challenge leftist sensibilities.
>
> Yet on every question the  left did much worse. On the monopoly question, 
the
> portion of  progressive/very liberals answering incorrectly (31%) was more
> than  twice that of conservatives (13%) and more than four times that of
>  libertarians (7%). On the question about living standards, the portion  
of
> progressive/very liberals answering incorrectly (61%) was more than  four
> times that of conservatives (13%) and almost three times that  of
> libertarians (21%).
>
> The survey also asked about  party affiliation. Those responding 
Democratic
> averaged 4.59 incorrect  answers. Republicans averaged 1.61 incorrect, and
> Libertarians 1.26  incorrect.
>
> Adam Smith described political economy as "a branch  of the science of a
> statesman or legislator." Governmental power  joined with wrongheadedness 
is
> something terrible, but all too common.  Realizing that many of our 
leaders
> and their constituents are  economically unenlightened sheds light on the
> troubles that surround  us.
>
> Mr. Klein is a professor of economics at George Mason  University. This 
op-ed
> is based on an article published in the May  2010 issue of the journal he
> edits, Econ Journal Watch, a project  sponsored by the American Institute 
for
> Economic Research. The article  is at:
>  
http://econjwatch.org/articles/economic-enlightenment-in-relation-to-college-going-ideology-and-other-variables-a-zogby-survey-of-americans

_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


 
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to