Accuracy in Media The Gay Infiltration of the Conservative Movement By Cliff Kincaid | February 22, 2010
“The media gave these clowns a lot of favorable coverage,” noted one traditional conservative activist who was upset by the drift of CPAC this year. California Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) chairman Ryan Sorba generated a media controversy when he was shown at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) denouncing the organizers for inviting a homosexual Republican group, GOProud, into the event as an official sponsor. In “ controversial” remarks, Sorba said homosexuality was unnatural and that he welcomed more debate and discussion about the subject from his political adversaries. But what many people don’t realize is that Sorba’s “outburst” was provoked by a speaker who preceded him, Alexander McCobin of Students For Liberty (SFL). McCobin went out of his way to use valuable time from the podium to thank the American Conservative Union, the main CPAC organizer, for making the controversial decision to approve GOProud’s participation. _David Keene_ (http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/speakers/keene.asp) , a lobbyist, is the chairman of the ACU and personally approved GOProud’s involvement in CPAC. Sorba told AIM, “I think CPAC went overboard this year. I don’t think he [Keene] should be sitting at the top of CPAC.” He noted that CPAC over the last several years has also allowed groups such as the ACLU to have exhibits at the event. “What’s next?,” Sorba asked. “Are they going to have Republicans for Obamacare? Republicans for free abortions?” Incredibly, McCobin of SFL told me that his group “is not a conservative organization” and that “We spent this past weekend reaching out to the left and the right at both the Young Democrats of America’s convention and the Conservative Political Action Conference. We are not left or right.” If they are not conservative, Sorba asked, “What are they doing at CPAC?” No stranger to controversy, Sorba is the author of the book, _The Born Gay Hoax_ (http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08a/born_gay_hoax/TheBornGayHoax.pdf) (this is a working draft) and was _shouted down_ (http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/08a/born_gay_hoax/smith_0329/index.html) at Smith College by lesbian activists because of his support for traditional values. Sorba said the negative reaction he got from some in the CPAC audience came from those in libertarian and pro-Ron Paul groups whose purpose is “to infiltrate the conservative movement and take it over from within.” He said that he received strong support after the event from traditional conservatives. Proving the point, McCobin’s SFL is based at the libertarian Cato Institute, which has a conservative view on federal spending issues but promotes a U.S. military withdrawal from much of the world and very liberal social views, such as legalization of marijuana and other drugs. Adding to the controversy, the Cato Institute has been funded by the ultra-liberal billionaire George Soros, a major financial benefactor of many different “progressive” organizations. The Open Society Institute of Soros has put tens of thousands of dollars into Cato for such purposes as a “lecture series” on the dangers of a war on drugs, a project to prevent a national system of identification under the immigration laws, and a “Civil Liberties and Counterterrorism Initiative” that protects the civil liberties and human rights of accused terrorists. What’s more, GOProud isn’t a conservative group, either. Christopher R. Barron, chairman of GOProud, runs _CapSouth Consulting_ (http://www.capsouthdc.com/about/) , which works for “centrist Republicans”–not conservatives. So the issue isn’t just why GOProud was at CPAC but why Students For Liberty, an admittedly non-conservative group, was there and had a speaking role. “The media gave these clowns a lot of favorable coverage,” noted one traditional conservative activist who was upset by the drift of CPAC this year. “We have our work cut out for us, between the media and the libertarian student movement that supports sodomy. We are going to organize a huge turnout of socially conservative youth next year, to offset the libertarian slide that CPAC has taken.” At David Horowitz’s Newsreal blog, the libertarian slide was also in evidence, as Ryan Mauro _wrote_ (http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/02/21/ryan-sorba-is-an-arrogant-tool/) that Sorba’s tough response to McCobin and others amounted to “condemning CPAC for allowing homosexuals who share their agenda to co-sponsor them.” In fact, GOProud’s commitment to constitutionally protected homosexual sodomy (i.e., anal intercourse) is not a position that appears on the agenda of any conservative groups. Hence, using the term “gay conservative” to describe these people is either a deliberate deception or an oxymoron that doesn ’t stand up under scrutiny. Mauro claimed, “I know many conservatives who do not have a problem with homosexuals openly serving in the military, and many more who find banning sodomy to be an act of big government.” Of course, the “banning” of homosexuality is not realistically possible at this stage in the United States because the Supreme Court has effectively legalized it. But how will open homosexuals in the U.S. military be greeted on Muslim lands where homosexuality is still illegal? Mauro, who runs a _website_ (http://www.worldthreats.com/) about foreign threats, may want to examine this problem. GOProud, the organization at the center of the storm, claims to be “ conservative” but supports the Obama policy of putting active and open homosexuals in the military, supports homosexual marriage, and even advocates a foreign policy of promoting acceptance of sodomy abroad. The latter is referred to as “Standing strong against radical regimes who seek to criminalize gays and lesbians.” These “radical regimes,” such as the Christian-dominated government in Uganda, are trying to prevent the spread of AIDS and protect traditional moral values by toughening laws against homosexuality. Under these “gay conservatives,” one can imagine gay soldiers being deployed to overthrow “homophobic” regimes. GOProud also says it wants to “defend the Constitution” in the U.S. by “ Opposing any anti-gay federal marriage amendment.” It doesn’t explain how protecting the country against out-of-control judges legalizing gay marriage without a vote of the people is unconstitutional. David Barton of Wallbuilders, whose knowledge about the moral foundations of America has been cited and recognized by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, _points out_ (http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=101) that the founding fathers regarded homosexual sodomy as a crime against nature and believed it should be outlawed and punished severely. Indeed, Barton cites a case in which General George Washington himself authorized the expulsion of a solder from the army for sodomy. Barton writes that “It can be safely said that the attitude of the Founders on the subject of homosexuality was precisely that given by William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws–the basis of legal jurisprudence in America and heartily endorsed by numbers of significant Founders. In addressing sodomy (homosexuality), he found the subject so reprehensible that he was ashamed even to discuss it.” Blackstone called it “the infamous crime against nature.” Barton goes on, “Because of the nature of the crime, the penalties for the act of sodomy were often severe. For example, Thomas Jefferson indicated that in his home state of Virginia, ‘dismemberment’ of the offensive organ was the penalty for sodomy. In fact, Jefferson himself authored a bill penalizing sodomy by castration. The laws of the other states showed similar or even more severe penalties…” Much of this history has been ignored or forgotten, even by some conservatives. Modern-day conservatives do not necessarily want to “ban” sodomy as a private activity but they do not want to see it promoted in the schools or given special status by government. Many want its negative health effects to be given as much scrutiny as smoking and eating fast food. _McCobin,_ (http://studentsforliberty.org/about/leadership/eb/mccobin/) who had preceded Sorba and provoked the controversy, has close ties to the Cato Institute and its executive vice president, David Boaz, a member of the Independent Gay Forum and pro-marijuana activist. Boaz sits on the board of Students for Liberty. Earlier in the week, one day before CPAC, Boaz had moderated a forum on “ gay conservatives” at the Cato Institute that featured Andrew Sullivan, the HIV-positive writer who voted for John Kerry in 2004 because President George W. Bush opposed homosexual marriage. Sullivan later got “married” to another man. McCobin’s CPAC remarks consisted of the following: “In the name of freedom, I would like to thank the American Conservative Union for welcoming GOProud as a co-sponsor of this event, not for any political reason but for the message it sends….Students today recognize that freedom does not come in pieces. Freedom is a single thing that applies to the social as well as the economic realms and should be defended at all times.” McCobin has become a celebrity of sorts on the _“Gay Patriot” website_ (http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/20/gaypatriot-exclusive-interviewalexander-m ccobin-from-students-for-libertythe-student-activist-who-spoke-up-for-goprou d-at-cpac/) , which describes itself as “the internet home for American gay conservatives” and an affiliate of Pajamas Media. The blog is produced by Bruce Carroll and Dan Blatt. Asked to explain where Students For Liberty stands on the major social issues, McCobin told me that his group doesn’t take “policy stances” on such issues as abortion and illegal drug use. But it does apparently believe that government should protect and promote the right to practice homosexuality. On the question of whether male homosexuals should have the right to donate blood (they are currently prohibited because of their propensity to develop HIV and other life-threatening diseases), McCobin, who said he isn’t gay, claimed, “I don’t know enough about the situation to comment on this.” On the association with the Cato Institute, he asserted, “Students For Liberty is not affiliated with Cato in any way.” However, he acknowledged that “Cato in-kinds office space to SFL for our use, and we work together on initiatives sometimes (e.g., Cato was one of many sponsors of the 3rd Annual International Students For Liberty Conference last weekend and Cato and SFL co-sponsored a republishing of Cato’s ’With all due respect, Mr. President, that is not true’ ad in student newspapers after it was successful in national papers last year), but there is no formal relationship and Cato does not fund SFL. SFL is run by students and recent alumni dedicated to liberty as an independent entity. Cato believes in what SFL is doing and we believe in what Cato is doing and so work together when we can.” SFL’s office is listed on _its website_ (http://studentsforliberty.org/contact/) as at the Cato Institute. For his part, Sorba wants to generate more controversy. He told AIM that he wants to debate Andrew Sullivan as well as Rachel Maddow, the lesbian host of an MSNBC-TV show. ____________________________________ Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Centroids mailing list: [email protected] http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/
