Excellent summary until near the end. Couple of problems :
 
( 1 ) for the sake of honesty is should be admitted that Christians  also
selectively read the Bible. This is because the immensity of the Bible  
itself
does not --to say the least-- allow for a simple reading of all the texts  
in it.
How do you come up with an easy to understand interpretation of  both Song 
of Solomon
and Joshua, or , say, Acts and Revelation ?
 
But it also is because Christians have competing interests, hence divide  
into groups
which stress some passages and ignore others. That is, we have Baptists,  
Catholics,
Greek Orthodox, Lutherans, corner church Evangelicals , and many  others.
 
( 2 ) while I personally agree that the love which Jesus exemplified  is 
the best remedy
for many of the ills of life, indeed, in a sense is indispensable, how does 
 that become
a universal solvent ?  In other words, it is safe to say that a  marriage 
not based on love
is no marriage at all, regardless life is not so simple. What happens when  
kids are
involved despite the fact that mommy and daddy no longer can stand the  
sight
of each other ? What happens when either mommy or daddy ( or both )  make
stupid decisions that land the family in incredible  debt ?   And you can 
easily
think of many other problems that require "other" than love, like high  
order level
knowledge of finance, that require legal expertise, etc. 
 
Hence the ending of the otherwise superlative article strikes me as  missing
the boat, oversimplifying life to make a perfectly valid point. But if  you
oversimplify, while the point remains true, then the issues you most  want
to address become questionable / unconvincing.
 
My view anyway
Billy
 
=====================================================
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/17/2010 8:55:26 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Hi  Ernie,

Yes, indeed - thank you for posting that. 

//  Lennart

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar  
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:


 
 
 
 
A brilliant, concise summary. -- Ernie P. 
 (http://disciplenations.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/great-mosque-5004.jpg) 
Four kinds of adherents comprise Islam as  religion. 
The silent majority are Pragmatists who want to live in  security. Whatever 
objections they may have about Islamic violence, they  don’t rock the boat. 
The Reformers, a small and courageous minority, embrace an Islam  of peace. 
They are natural allies of their fellow monotheists, Jews and  Christians. 
The Fundamentalists, one of the largest groups, eschew  engagement with the 
world. They indict the moral bankruptcy of the West  and want to see Islam 
restored to its glorious past. They may give  sympathy and support to their 
passionate Jihadist brothers. 
The Jihadists are Fundamentalists with firearms. They believe  that all 
good Muslims must raise the sword and destroy Israel and the  West. 
Each of these groups—those who embrace dialogue with Christians and  those 
who want to kill them—follow Muhammad’s teachings. 
Islam is a religion of peace. It is a religion of war.  Islam is, in some 
ways, two religions, divided by the two eras of  Muhammad’s life. 
In Mecca until age 52, the prophet tried to persuade Christians and  Jews 
of the truth of Islam. When few converted, Muhammad moved to Medina  and 
changed his tactics. Persuasion had produced little fruit. It was time  for a 
new strategy: coercion. Christians and Jews became infidels to be  converted 
through warfare. 
The Qur’an—revelation to Muhammad from the angel Gabriel—reflects these  
two periods of his life. The angel’s words received in Mecca summon  Muslims 
to enlightenment, while those he heard in Medina call for more  strident 
behavior. All Muslims read the Qur’an, but they tend to read  different parts. 
Reformers  read the Mecca texts. Islam is a religion of peace,  Jihad an 
internal struggle. Jews and Christians are converted through  persuasion. 
Freedom, peace and enlightenment in a pluralistic society are  valued. 
The Fundamentalists and Jihadists read the Medina texts. Islam spreads  by 
conquest. Non-Muslims are to be conquered and forced to choose from  three 
options: become Muslims, submit to absolute Muslim rule and  taxation, or be 
killed. 
As for discrepancies in the Qur’an, “[W]hen there is a  contradiction 
between verses in the Koran, the later verse supersedes the  earlier verse.”
_[1]_ 
(http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/Users/Gary/Documents/Wholism/DNA/Blog/Is%20Islam%20a%20religion%20of%20peace.docx#_ftn1)
  Since the Medina texts 
came later, they take  priority. So, Jihadists have the edge. Conquest 
trumps persuasion. 
Followers of Jesus Christ are called to be “as shrewd as serpents and  as 
harmless as doves.” Toward  moderates we can be doves, winsomely  engaging in 
dialogue with a view to upholding Christ as the unique Savior  of 
(http://disciplenations.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/three-crosses1.jpg)  the 
world. 
Towards all Muslims we are to demonstrate  God’s love. There are growing 
numbers of stories where both  Fundamentalists and Jihadists are transformed 
when confronted by   sacrificial love and service. As Jihadist form terror 
cells, Christians  can form radical love cells to minister to the needs of 
their 
Muslim  neighbors. 
- Darrow Miller    
____________________________________
 _[1]_ 
(http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/Users/Gary/Documents/Wholism/DNA/Blog/Is%20Islam%20a%20religion%20of%20peace.docx#_ftnref1)
 Ibn Warraq as 
quoted in Brigitte Gabriel, Because  They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror 
Warns America, (New York: St.  Martin’s Press, 2006), 152 



 
(http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/islam-religion-of-peace-or-religion-of-war)
  
(http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/islam-religion-of-peace-or-religion-of-war)
 
_http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/islam-religion-of-peace-or-religion-of-war_
 
(http://disciplenations.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/islam-religion-of-peace-or-religion-of-war)
 





_______________________________________________





_______________________________________________
Centroids  mailing list:  [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives  at  
http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/


_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to