Lion's  Den: The Left’s new enemy: ‘Empire’ 
_By DANIEL  PIPES_ (mailto:[email protected])  
Jerusalem Post
06/22/2010  21:54 


What the Left  seeks: One catchword is authenticity.
 
We know  what Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao wanted (state control of 
everything) and how  they achieved this goal (brutal totalitarianism); but what 
do 
their successors  today want and how do they hope to achieve it? It’s a 
curiously unexamined  subject.

Ernest Sternberg of the University at Buffalo offers answers in  an 
eye-opening article in a recent issue of Orbis, “Purifying the World: What the 
New  
Radical Ideology Stands For.” He begins by sketching out what the 
contemporary  far Left (as opposed to the “decent Left”) opposes and what it  
wants.
 
What the Left opposes: The prime  enemy is something called Empire (no 
definite article needed), a supposed global  monolith that dominates, exploits 
and oppresses the world.

Sternberg  summarizes the Left’s all-embracing indictment of Empire: “
People live in  poverty, food is contaminated, products are artificial, 
wasteful 
consumption is  compelled, indigenous groups are dispossessed and nature 
itself is  subverted.

Invasive species run rampant, glaciers melt and seasons are  thrown out of 
kilter, threatening world catastrophe.”

Empire achieves  this by means of “economic liberalism, militarism, 
multinational corporations,  corporate media and technologies of surveillance.” 
Because capitalism causes  millions of deaths that a non-capitalism system 
would eliminate, it also is  guilty of mass-murder.

The United States, of course, is the Great Satan,  accused of hoarding 
disproportionate resources. Its military oppresses the poor  so its 
corporations 
can exploit them. Its government promotes the pretend-danger  of terrorism 
to aggress abroad and repress at home.

And Israel is the  Little Satan, serving as Empire’s sinister ally – or 
maybe the Jewish state is  really the master? From World Social Forum meetings 
in Brazil to the UN  antiracism conference in Durban and from mainline 
churches to NGOs, Zionism is  represented as absolute evil. Why Israel? Beyond 
the not-so-subtle  anti-Semitism, it alone of Western countries lives under a 
barrage of constant  threats, which in turn compel it to engage in constant 
wars.

“Stripped of  all context,” Sternberg notes, “Israel’s actions fit the 
needed image of  aggressor.”

TO FIGHT Empire’s superior resources, the Left needs to ally  with anyone 
else opposing it – notably Islamists. Islamist goals contradict the  Left’s, 
but no matter; so long as Islamists help fight Empire, they have a  valued 
place in the coalition.

What the  Left seeks: One catchword is authenticity: Empire’s artificiality 
makes  indigenous culture analogous to endangered species. Culture should 
be  indigenous, organic and sheltered from Empire’s crass commercialism 
(e.g.,  Hollywood), its bogus rationalism and its false concepts of freedom.

A  second catchword is democracy: The Left rejects the distant and 
formalistic  structure of a mature republic and instead celebrates grassroots, 
non-hegemonic  democracy that offers a more direct voice. The democratic 
process, 
Sternberg  explains, “will proceed through meetings freed from the 
manipulative reins of  law, procedure, precedent and hierarchy.”

These high-flying words,  however, disguise a recipe for despotism; those 
laws, procedures, precedents and  hierarchy serve a very real purpose.

A third is sustainability. To  integrate economies into Earth’s ecosystem, 
the new order “will run on  alternative energy, organic farming, local food 
markets and closed-loop  recyclable industry, if any industry is needed. 
People will travel on public  transit, or ride cars that tread lightly on the 
earth, or even better, ride  bicycles. They will occupy green buildings 
constructed of local materials and  inhabit cities growing organically within 
bioregions. Life will be liberated  from carbon emanations. It will be a 
permanent, placid way of  life.”

Socialism definitely forms part of this picture, but economics no  longer 
dominates, as once it did.

The new leftist goal is more complex  than mere anti-capitalism, 
constituting an entire way of life. Sternberg dubs  this movement world 
purificationism, but I prefer left-fascism.

He then  asks the vital question: Will the Left’s latest incarnation once 
again turn  totalitarian? He finds it too early to answer definitely but 
points to several  “totalitarian warning signs,” including the dehumanizing of 
enemies and  accusations of mass murder.

He warns of an inflection point when  Leftfascists “stand true to their 
cataclysmic rhetoric and strap on suicide  belts or take up arms to become 
martyrs.”

In other words, the dangers are  real and present.

So much for those fashionable theories of two decades  ago, trumpeted as 
the Berlin Wall fell, about the end of ideology. The Left  retrenched after 
the fall of Leninism and now threatens humanity with a new  version of its 
anti-Western, anti-rational, anti-liberty, anti-individualist  ideology.

The writer is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube  distinguished 
visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford  University.
_______________________________________________
Centroids mailing list: [email protected]
http://radicalcentrism.com/mailman/listinfo/centroids_radicalcentrism.com
Archives at http://radicalcentrism.org/pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/

Reply via email to