On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Sage Weil wrote:

> Ah, ok, makes sense.  Can you describe the workload leading up to the rm a
> bit?  Is it this something you can reproduce?  I can see where it bugged,
> but that's unfortuantely a long way off from the root of the problem
> (which looks like a missing ref count on the dentry).

This should be the relevant workload. I run this on all nodes and with 
wrappers around to get the bandwidth.

  cd /ceph/tmp
  rm -f `hostname`.tmp `hostname`.done
  dd if=/hda/tmp/knoppix.iso of=`hostname`.tmp bs=1M
  mv `hostname`.tmp `hostname`.done

--jerker

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ceph-devel mailing list
Ceph-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ceph-devel

Reply via email to