On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Markus Kienast <[email protected]> wrote:
> How does ceph differentiate itself from xtreemfs?
Ceph and XtreemFS have pretty different goals.
>From what I've read, Xtreemfs is designed as a WAN distributed FS with
interesting file replication strategies designed to minimize latency
across the internet.
Ceph is a cluster filesystem designed to be used across a high-speed
low-latency network that provides pseudo-random but deterministic
block-based replication of data, with strong consistency guarantees,
and extreme scalability. (Unlike xtreemfs, Ceph can shard
responsibility for metadata across many nodes, and since it calculates
data placement rather than assigning it, less metadata needs to be
stored and cached.)

If you have more specific questions (preferably with indications of
how xtreemfs behaves; I'm not terribly familiar with it) we can answer
those in more detail. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to