On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:20:37PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > > It also seem like it basically should not be be opencoded but in a > > wrapper around dentry_lru_del for all cases but the lazy removal from > > LRU in case that is referenced, with some comments explaining the whole > > thing. > > Yeah, that's a bit better. There are four dentry_lru_del() callers, two > where we there is a reference, and two where we want to ->d_prune too. > > How does the below look?
This looks much better. It will clash a bit with Dave's dcache series that were part of his shrinker/lru series, which I really hope he is going to resumit for 3.2 (at least the dcache cleanup parts). Al, any progress on getting the current VFS queue up somewhere for review? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
