On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Greg Farnum <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You know, I'd be really happy if this could be achieved by means of
>> removing cephx keys.
> Unfortunately, that wouldn't really solve the problem without dramatically 
> decreasing the rotation interval for cluster access keys which cephx shares. 
> Alternative (entirely theoretical) security schemes might, but they're well 
> behind what's feasible for us to work on any time soon...

I wouldn't want to rely on timed rotation. Fencing triggering a
rotation on demand, then again.. that I do like.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to