Hi Sage,

On 27 Sep 2012, at 21:07, Sage Weil wrote:

> 
> On the release side, this is also the first release for which we are 
> building RPMs. Hooray! We're starting with just CentOS6/RHEL6 and Fedora 
> 17 on x86_64, but will be adding additional distributions for v0.53, 
> including OpenSUSE and Fedora 18. If there is a particular RPM-based 
> distro that you'd like to see us build packages for, please let us know!
> 
> You can get v0.52 from:
> * Git at git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git
> * Tarball athttp://ceph.com/download/ceph-0.52.tar.gz
> * For Debian/Ubuntu packages, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/debian
> * For RPMs, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/rpm

Scientific Linux 6 is something that we use here at our site, it's binary 
compatible with RHEL6 and Centos6. Since there is a 'stable' series of releases 
and a series of 'testing and development' releases would it be better to setup 
a repo with only stable releases and a testing repo for all development builds 
(and nighty builds)? It would make it easier for anyone who wants to deploy 
ceph  in production to just point to a stable repo and not get a development 
builds. It would be similar to how epel might structure their repos with a 
stable and a testing repo.

Regards,
Jimmy Tang

--
Senior Software Engineer, Digital Repository of Ireland (DRI)
Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing,
Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to