On 01/29/2013 10:23 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote: >> On 01/29/2013 05:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote: >>>> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z....@intel.com> >>>> >>>> _rename_finish() does not send dentry link/unlink message to replicas. >>>> We should prevent dentries that are modified by the rename operation >>>> from getting new replicas when the rename operation is committing. So >>>> don't mark xlocks "done" and early reply for rename >>> >>> Can we change this to only skip early reply if there are replicas? Or >>> change things so we do send thos messages (or something isilar) early? As >>> is this will kill workloads like rsync that rename every file. >>> >> >> How about not mark xlocks on dentries done. > > Yeah, I like that if we do that just in the rename case. > > The other patches look okay to me (from a quick review). With that change > I'd like to pull the whole branch in. I assume your current wip-mds > branch include sthe fix or squashes the problem from the previous series? >
Just force update my wip-mds branch. That patch is renamed to "mds: don't set xlocks on dentries done when early reply rename". I also updated "mds: preserve non-auth/unlinked objects until slave commit" and "mds: fix slave rename rollback". The new patches trim non-auth subtrees more actively. Regards Yan, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
