On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Jim Schutt wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> On 02/26/2013 12:36 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Jim Schutt wrote:
> >>> I think the right solution is to make an option that will setsockopt on 
> >>> SO_RECVBUF to some value (say, 256KB).  I pushed a branch that does this, 
> >>> wip-tcp.  Do you mind checking to see if this addresses the issue 
> >>> (without 
> >>> manually adjusting things in /proc)?
> >>
> >> I'll be happy to test it out...
> > 
> > That would be great!  It's branch wip-tcp, and the setting is 'ms tcp 
> > rcvbuf'.
> 
> I've verified that I can reproduce the slowdown with the
> default value of 1 for /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_moderate_rcvbuf,
> and 'ms tcp rcvbuf' at 0.
> 
> I've also verified that I could not reproduce any slowdown when
> I configure 'ms tcp rcvbuf' to 256 KiB on OSDs.
> 
> So, that's great news - sorry for the delay in testing.

Awesome--thanks so much for testing that!  Pulling it into master now.
 
> Also, FWIW, I ended up testing with commits cb15e6e0f4 and
> c346282940 cherry-picked on top of next as of a day or
> so ago (commit f58601d681), as for some reason wip-tcp
> wouldn't work for me - ceph-mon was non-responsive in
> some way I didn't dig into.

Yeah, sorry about that.  I rebased wip-tcp a few days ago but you may have 
picked up the previous version.

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to