From: "Yan, Zheng" <[email protected]> If the underwater dentry is a remove link, we shouldn't mark the inode clean
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <[email protected]> --- src/mds/CDir.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/mds/CDir.cc b/src/mds/CDir.cc index 4ef6e8f..9b49c10 100644 --- a/src/mds/CDir.cc +++ b/src/mds/CDir.cc @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ void CDir::_fetched(bufferlist &bl, const string& want_dn) dout(10) << "_fetched had underwater dentry " << *dn << ", marking clean" << dendl; dn->mark_clean(); - if (dn->get_linkage()->get_inode()) { + if (dn->get_linkage()->is_primary()) { assert(dn->get_linkage()->get_inode()->get_version() <= got_fnode.version); dout(10) << "_fetched had underwater inode " << *dn->get_linkage()->get_inode() << ", marking clean" << dendl; dn->get_linkage()->get_inode()->mark_clean(); -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
