On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Just to confirm what Adam and I are doing on this end, ie, this is our plan 
> to rebase wip-libcephfs following wip-libcephfs-rebase.
> 
> * proceeding commit-wise on wip-libcephfs-rebase, mapping each change back to 
> a commit in wip-libcephfs

I wouldn't worry about referencing the original commits unless it is 
important to you guys (it isn't to me).  Those commits won't appear in the 
canonical ceph.git source tree anyway.

> ** striking out anything marked reject in rebase
> ** striking out anything marked "whitespace"
> *** (unless you want these)

We can keep the whitespace fixes, as long as they are in spearate patches 
from real changes

> ** either striking out or motivating in commit message anything marked "why"
> ** updating commit messages of every commit which remains
> *** with author, signed off by, SHAs of the source commit(s), updated commit 
> message (background authors)
> * test, fix, and rebase as necessary
> * cherry-pick changes from Ilya
> ** adapt anything we propose to adjust in new commits
> * rebase on head
> * push to our Ceph repo for review/pull when ready

Sounds good!

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to