On Sat, 1 Mar 2014, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> ceph_fh_to_parent() finds the inode that corresponds to the 'ino' field
> of struct ceph_nfs_confh. This is wrong, it should find the inode that
> corresponds to the 'parent_ino' field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <[email protected]>

It's been a while since I've looked at this, but I'm a bit confused.

If we have a get_parent() operation that will reliably get the parent 
directory for an inode, why do we want/need the ceph_nfs_confh?  If we 
*do* have that struct and look up the parent_ino, we have no guarantee 
that it is still the parent if there has been an intervening rename.  
Would it be better to always use ceph_nfs_fh, and rely on LOOKUPPARENT 
instead?

Thanks-
sage


> ---
>  fs/ceph/export.c | 38 +++++---------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/export.c b/fs/ceph/export.c
> index 905d7f2..017af26 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/export.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/export.c
> @@ -122,49 +122,21 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_fh_to_dentry(struct 
> super_block *sb,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * get parent, if possible.
> - *
> - * FIXME: we could do better by querying the mds to discover the
> - * parent.
> + * convert regular fh to parent
>   */
>  static struct dentry *ceph_fh_to_parent(struct super_block *sb,
> -                                      struct fid *fid,
> +                                     struct fid *fid,
>                                       int fh_len, int fh_type)
>  {
>       struct ceph_nfs_confh *cfh = (void *)fid->raw;
> -     struct ceph_vino vino;
> -     struct inode *inode;
> -     struct dentry *dentry;
> -     int err;
>  
> -     if (fh_type == 1)
> +     if (fh_type != FILEID_INO32_GEN_PARENT)
>               return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>       if (fh_len < sizeof(*cfh) / 4)
>               return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
>  
> -     pr_debug("fh_to_parent %llx/%d\n", cfh->parent_ino,
> -              cfh->parent_name_hash);
> -
> -     vino.ino = cfh->ino;
> -     vino.snap = CEPH_NOSNAP;
> -     inode = ceph_find_inode(sb, vino);
> -     if (!inode)
> -             return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
> -
> -     dentry = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> -     if (IS_ERR(dentry)) {
> -             pr_err("fh_to_parent %llx -- inode %p but ENOMEM\n",
> -                    cfh->ino, inode);
> -             iput(inode);
> -             return dentry;
> -     }
> -     err = ceph_init_dentry(dentry);
> -     if (err < 0) {
> -             iput(inode);
> -             return ERR_PTR(err);
> -     }
> -     dout("fh_to_parent %llx %p dentry %p\n", cfh->ino, inode, dentry);
> -     return dentry;
> +     pr_debug("fh_to_parent %llx\n", cfh->parent_ino);
> +     return __fh_to_dentry(sb, cfh->parent_ino);
>  }
>  
>  const struct export_operations ceph_export_ops = {
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to