Le mardi 25 mars 2014 à 08:31 -0500, Alex Elder a écrit :
> ...
> >> So, a (partial) fix can be this patch ?
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, roughly.  I'd do the following instead.  It would be great
> > to learn whether it eliminates the one form of assertion failure
> > you were seeing.
> > 
> >                                     -Alex
> >
> 
> 
> Strike that, my last patch was dead wrong.  Sorry.  Try this:
> 
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -2128,11 +2128,11 @@ static void rbd_img_obj_callback(struct
>       rbd_assert(img_request->obj_request_count > 0);
>       rbd_assert(which != BAD_WHICH);
>       rbd_assert(which < img_request->obj_request_count);
> -     rbd_assert(which >= img_request->next_completion);
> 
>       spin_lock_irq(&img_request->completion_lock);
> -     if (which != img_request->next_completion)
> +     if (which > img_request->next_completion)
>               goto out;
> +     rbd_assert(which == img_request->next_completion);
> 
>       for_each_obj_request_from(img_request, obj_request) {
>               rbd_assert(more);
> 

Thanks !

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to