I wrote:
> Sage Weil wrote:
> > If anybody is interested in helping with that effort, pull requests
> > are very welcome!  :)
> > 
[snip]

> As hinted at in the patch, something like boost::program_options would
> be nice, but that's a chunk of work & I'd rather hear feedback first
> this way or the other. For the boost option, not sure if verbose error
> reporting (the if (oss) parts) would translate over easily, I presume
> that is deemed important?
> 
Hi guys,

any further opinion on that? If no one feels strongly, I think I'll
just go ahead & hack something up with program_options, and see if
that looks more pleasant. :)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to