On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Alphe Salas wrote: > Real field testings and proof workout are better than any unit testing ... I > would follow Dan s notice of resolution because it based on real problem and > not fony style test ground.
It's been reviewed and look right, but the rados torture tests are pretty ... torturous, and this code is delicate. I would still wait. > Sage apart that problem is there a solution to the ever expending replicas > problem ? Discard for the kernel RBD client should go upstream this cycle. As for RADOS consuming more data when RBD blocks are overwritten, I still have yet to see any actual evidence of this, and have a hard time seeing how it could happen. A sequence of steps to reproduce would be the next step. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
